Template talk:MissingInfo: Difference between revisions
m (→Categories: new section) |
(→Categories 2.0: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Could someone (I'm not good enough at coding) edit the template to add the option to remove the Stub categorisation? Not all pages this is used on are stubs. [[Dawn's Mamoswine]] is a good example. The default should be to include the page in the category, as that will make for less edits to adjust the relevant pages. [[User:Werdnae]] [[User talk:Werdnae|<small>(talk)</small>]] 09:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | Could someone (I'm not good enough at coding) edit the template to add the option to remove the Stub categorisation? Not all pages this is used on are stubs. [[Dawn's Mamoswine]] is a good example. The default should be to include the page in the category, as that will make for less edits to adjust the relevant pages. [[User:Werdnae]] [[User talk:Werdnae|<small>(talk)</small>]] 09:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Categories 2.0 == | |||
Would it be possible to remove this template from the overarching category of 'Articles needing more information'? There are already subcategories within the main category referring to each particular type of information the page needs and some, outside of the information this template seeks, are no longer incomplete. It would make it much easier to traverse the main category then for those who can't provide this information (like myself). --[[User:Spriteit|Spriteit]] 13:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:52, 17 December 2011
Dub names, dub name spellings and photos.
The template considers only three types of Missing Info - Japanese Name, English VA and Japanese VA. However, many articles also lack Character Pictures, sometimes a character's dub name is unknown (because it was not told in the English version and must be checked in Subtitles) or something the character's name spelling is unclear (and shall be checked in Subtitles). I think we should also consider a template for that type of missing information and put it on articles which miss them! --Maxim 17:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Seconded. Either that or someone makes a new photo-needed template (with a picture of this guy? — THE TROM — 06:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories
Could someone (I'm not good enough at coding) edit the template to add the option to remove the Stub categorisation? Not all pages this is used on are stubs. Dawn's Mamoswine is a good example. The default should be to include the page in the category, as that will make for less edits to adjust the relevant pages. User:Werdnae (talk) 09:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories 2.0
Would it be possible to remove this template from the overarching category of 'Articles needing more information'? There are already subcategories within the main category referring to each particular type of information the page needs and some, outside of the information this template seeks, are no longer incomplete. It would make it much easier to traverse the main category then for those who can't provide this information (like myself). --Spriteit 13:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
