Talk:Luke: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Forgot to say in my edit summary: I am a ChromeOwholic by the way 8D) |
Rai Marshall (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::::::::It's still not good whatsoever. I prefer, nay recommend, that the widths be removed from the boxes. So what if there will be huge white space, at least the things would be readable to everyone. [[User:Rai Marshall|Rai Marshall]] 07:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | :::::::::It's still not good whatsoever. I prefer, nay recommend, that the widths be removed from the boxes. So what if there will be huge white space, at least the things would be readable to everyone. [[User:Rai Marshall|Rai Marshall]] 07:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::To be honest, Ataro is right. It's not just about a single article, it is the same problem with move templates, sometime movie templates and a lot of other articles. I think switching to Firefox is a good idea. <span style="color:#FF0">♫♪</span>[[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#00FA9A;">'''エイデ'''</span>]][[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#9F9;">'''ィニズ'''</span>]]<span style="color:#FF0">♪♫</span> 07:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | ::::::::::To be honest, Ataro is right. It's not just about a single article, it is the same problem with move templates, sometime movie templates and a lot of other articles. I think switching to Firefox is a good idea. <span style="color:#FF0">♫♪</span>[[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#00FA9A;">'''エイデ'''</span>]][[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#9F9;">'''ィニズ'''</span>]]<span style="color:#FF0">♪♫</span> 07:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::Not everyone wants to or can switch to Firefox, I'm just saying. [[User:Rai Marshall|Rai Marshall]] 07:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:43, 4 July 2011
Forgot to say in my edit summary
Please stop taking the widths out of the Pokémon boxes. This is like the second time it's happened. It looks terrible having that large white space. Either expand his article or leave it as it is. Thank you. --ケンジのガール 06:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- And the "squeezed" way it is now, looking good? ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 06:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- The squeezed one looks even worse, they're unreadable now. If someone is going to readjust the width, they should go with the default widths that the other articles use. Rai Marshall 07:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Unreadable? There's nothing wrong with it. Ataro 07:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry but it's just Google Chrome that messing it up, apparently. Also, it is looking fine in Opera but still has a bit white empty space. However, it is working perfectly in Firefox. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 07:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes it is. 'Unreadable' as in, it's so squeezed that I plain don't want to read it at all. It's extremely messy and unpractical. Do I have to take a screenshot of what they look like? Rai Marshall 07:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Have a look at these screenshots from different browsers, Chrome, Firefox and Opera. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 07:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I use Google Chrome. The screenshot taken from it is exactly what's on my screen. Rai Marshall 07:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- From what I remember. Bulbapedia is best for Firefox users. Ataro 07:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's still not good whatsoever. I prefer, nay recommend, that the widths be removed from the boxes. So what if there will be huge white space, at least the things would be readable to everyone. Rai Marshall 07:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- To be honest, Ataro is right. It's not just about a single article, it is the same problem with move templates, sometime movie templates and a lot of other articles. I think switching to Firefox is a good idea. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 07:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not everyone wants to or can switch to Firefox, I'm just saying. Rai Marshall 07:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- To be honest, Ataro is right. It's not just about a single article, it is the same problem with move templates, sometime movie templates and a lot of other articles. I think switching to Firefox is a good idea. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 07:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's still not good whatsoever. I prefer, nay recommend, that the widths be removed from the boxes. So what if there will be huge white space, at least the things would be readable to everyone. Rai Marshall 07:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- From what I remember. Bulbapedia is best for Firefox users. Ataro 07:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I use Google Chrome. The screenshot taken from it is exactly what's on my screen. Rai Marshall 07:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Have a look at these screenshots from different browsers, Chrome, Firefox and Opera. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 07:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes it is. 'Unreadable' as in, it's so squeezed that I plain don't want to read it at all. It's extremely messy and unpractical. Do I have to take a screenshot of what they look like? Rai Marshall 07:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry but it's just Google Chrome that messing it up, apparently. Also, it is looking fine in Opera but still has a bit white empty space. However, it is working perfectly in Firefox. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 07:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Unreadable? There's nothing wrong with it. Ataro 07:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- The squeezed one looks even worse, they're unreadable now. If someone is going to readjust the width, they should go with the default widths that the other articles use. Rai Marshall 07:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
