Template talk:Indent

This page is a candidate for deletion because it is redundant. Someone has decided that this article should not be included as part of Bulbapedia. If you agree with this decision, state your reasoning on this article's talk page. If you disagree with deletion, make your voice heard. When a consensus has been reached, this notice can be removed by an administrator. Administrators - Remember to check if anything links here and the page history before deleting. This page was last edited on February 27, 2017 at 6:01 PM.

Why do we have this? It has always worked. The accepted practice was...

1 line

two

three

four

five

six

seven

eight

nine

ten

eleven starts over at one. We don't need a warning for it, and it is not what we are supposed to do. What I demonstrated above is what we are supposed to do. ^Maverick_Nate 00:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

There is no rule as to how indenting works. After 7 indents, I start over with no indents because that's my preference. Therefore, this template is useful for me. Chocolate_{((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions))} 00:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, just as long as I don't have to use it. ^Maverick_Nate 00:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Protection

Can someone please protect this template? --Cinday123 (Talk) 03:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Redundancy

I am thinking that this template is being redundant, because it is easy to type <small>(resetting indent)</small> (the code of this template). Yeah, typing {{indent}} may save bytes than typing the whole code, but it is still redundant. I am thinking of this being deleted or making this a substitution template. ★Poké⁹⁵ 12:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Protection?

It seems strange to me that this template, used all over the wiki, isn't protected. Is there a reason for this? If not, I'd recommend protecting it. --Felthry (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)