User talk:Unthank

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 02:32, 15 October 2007 by Unthank (talk | contribs) (→‎Linking)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Is the Biology info you're adding sourced, or are you making it up off the top of your head? I know using canon information is somewhat limiting, but using fanon significantly lowers our reliability as a resource. --Pie ~ 05:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

The biology information I'm adding is entirely from the pokedex, coupled with observations made from the games (i.e: it can be observed in Pokemon Snap that metapod are usually found suspended from someplace high, and will drop down when disturbed). Do you want me to go back and site the information I added. I read the information page about the pokedex project and completely understand the need to stick to canon sources: Unthank

Spelling

Pokémon. Always capitalized. And the é is always é, never e. Pokémon, not pokemon. TTEchidna 03:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Linking

Link templates: they're really, really, really, really important. Jeez, man, you linked to three disambiguation pages without noticing! Meowth, Espeon, and Staryu are the correct articles. TTEchidna 00:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that, and thank you for the guidance (both on this matter and the correct way to write "Pokémon" I didn't bother responding to that message). The three crappy links were done at the same time in the same article (thus the reason there where three of them....) but none the less. I shall try to be more careful next time. On a side, when the source of my information is the Pokédex, do I need to site this source...as it is on the same page. This doesn't seem to be the case in any of the other 'dex articles, but I am curious if such action is desired?