User talk:Maverick Nate: Difference between revisions
MannedTooth (talk | contribs) (→TCG vs tt template: new section) |
|||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
So, while I understand the uses of when we link a Ppkémon to its TCG card page when talking about the card name, but can you explain [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Feebas_(EX_Hidden_Legends_61)&curid=53698&diff=2509054&oldid=2508992 this edit] ? I would like to know why we shouldn't use the tt template instead, it makes it read as <code>Search your deck for a card that evolves from <b>this Pokémon</b></code> which is more than accurate. Anyway, I've undone [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Vulpix_(EX_Hidden_Legends_81)&curid=31160&diff=2509064&oldid=2509043 this one] too in case it should stay like it was. I'm waiting for your input on this ! :) [[User:MannedTooth|<span style="color:#FF8000"> MannedTooth </span>]] ([[User_Talk:MannedTooth|Talk]]) 01:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC) | So, while I understand the uses of when we link a Ppkémon to its TCG card page when talking about the card name, but can you explain [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Feebas_(EX_Hidden_Legends_61)&curid=53698&diff=2509054&oldid=2508992 this edit] ? I would like to know why we shouldn't use the tt template instead, it makes it read as <code>Search your deck for a card that evolves from <b>this Pokémon</b></code> which is more than accurate. Anyway, I've undone [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Vulpix_(EX_Hidden_Legends_81)&curid=31160&diff=2509064&oldid=2509043 this one] too in case it should stay like it was. I'm waiting for your input on this ! :) [[User:MannedTooth|<span style="color:#FF8000"> MannedTooth </span>]] ([[User_Talk:MannedTooth|Talk]]) 01:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
:A card that evolves from Vulpix won't only evolve from the specific EX Hidden Legends Vulpix, but any card printed with the name ''Vulpix''. Thus, that reference isn't only talking about that specific card and is linked accordingly. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 01:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:21, 25 September 2016
Please leave new messages at the bottom of this page. |
Notes |
---|
Contents |
---|
Archives |
---|
baby text follow up
So, the new updated baby template you mentioned me does not support this card. Thought I'd let you know! :) MannedTooth (Talk) 13:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- UPDATE: It won't support any of the babies of Aquapolis. MannedTooth (Talk) 14:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have addressed this issue one year ago Sunday, and we will get to it. MaverickNate 15:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
card infobox print
Shouldn't the card shown in the info box of this card be the most recent one (EX Power Keepers) ? It has the same code in the same order than this one, which shows the most recent one. How do you do that? MannedTooth (Talk) 15:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
CP6
Hi. I was just wondering for the cards from the Expansion Pack 20th Anniversary subset, are we redirecting to the original Base Set article or creating a new article? — Ruixiang95 20:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Only reprints are ever redirected to their original article. If the card features any gameplay-differing differences, then it is considered a brand new card. If the card plays the same as its retro print, then it should be redirected to the Original Era card, as it is only then considered a reprint. MaverickNate 20:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, may I know the difference between Charmeleon (Base Set 24) and Charmeleon (Expansion Pack 20th 10)? And if so, may I request to have a check on the CP6 articles I recently created and delete accordingly? — Ruixiang95 21:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- All the articles you've created so far are fine. Kakuna has a different attack effect for Stiffen, causing the attack to play differently. Mew has an Ability instead of a Pokémon Power, which makes the Expansion Pack 20th Anniversary Mew interact with cards like Garbodor while the Original Era Mew would not. Koffing is Psychic type and not Grass type, making it interact with different cards' Weaknesses and Resistances. Charmeleon's attack damages are different. Honestly I'm expecting there to be far fewer exact reprints than brand new cards. I was actually pretty surprised when I looked at Caterpie and realized they were the same. MaverickNate 21:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- So apparently, only Caterpie and Weedle are exact reprints. I have make a mistake on Hitmonchan (Expansion Pack 20th 60) and realized that they are two different cards, because of the HP and attack damages. I may have accidentally blanked the article, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused. — Ruixiang95 04:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- All the articles you've created so far are fine. Kakuna has a different attack effect for Stiffen, causing the attack to play differently. Mew has an Ability instead of a Pokémon Power, which makes the Expansion Pack 20th Anniversary Mew interact with cards like Garbodor while the Original Era Mew would not. Koffing is Psychic type and not Grass type, making it interact with different cards' Weaknesses and Resistances. Charmeleon's attack damages are different. Honestly I'm expecting there to be far fewer exact reprints than brand new cards. I was actually pretty surprised when I looked at Caterpie and realized they were the same. MaverickNate 21:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, may I know the difference between Charmeleon (Base Set 24) and Charmeleon (Expansion Pack 20th 10)? And if so, may I request to have a check on the CP6 articles I recently created and delete accordingly? — Ruixiang95 21:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
TCG vs tt template
So, while I understand the uses of when we link a Ppkémon to its TCG card page when talking about the card name, but can you explain this edit ? I would like to know why we shouldn't use the tt template instead, it makes it read as Search your deck for a card that evolves from this Pokémon
which is more than accurate. Anyway, I've undone this one too in case it should stay like it was. I'm waiting for your input on this ! :) MannedTooth (Talk) 01:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)