Talk:Pokémon Platinum Version/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
I'm not sure either way. All i can say is it is a good article. Perhaps we should have a "Good Article" thingy as well as the "Featured Article" thing. Coz then we can have catagorys for these "OK" articles. who agrees? [[User:SpecialK|SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch]] 11:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
======Agree====== | |||
[[User:SpecialK|SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch]] 11:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
======Disagree====== | |||
Revision as of 11:11, 13 February 2010
Pokémon Platinum Version
Support (1)
- A great article. Lots of information and describes the changes from DP very well. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 00:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Object (8)
- What makes this one so much more special than the other sister games? I feel that users have been getting FAC making happy, and we don't need such low level choices like this one clogging up the featured articles. MaverickNate 00:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- It's just a big old list, like all the other game articles. I don't think it's *that* great... ▫▪Ťïňắ ♫♥ 00:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- It's a good article, but like Mav said, users are too obssesed with making FACs (but then again, so am I), and this doesn't really stand out compared to other game articles. CuboneKing 02:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Tina. It just lists the changes from Diamond and Pearl, and though the article isn't bad, it just doesn't stand out enough. --rockersk08 02:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- DP is a better choice than this page, and it even has less info. Because this page is what's been said: a long list of changes from DP. R.A. Hunter Blade 02:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with all of the above. - Pokémon1234567890 19:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- If it wins, it would have to be more in-depth, but it's not, so I'm voting for no.--FlyingSkymin23 12:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Most of the article is a list of changes from DP. The next largest section is Trivia (which is not encouraged anyway), and then the intro.--SnorlaxMonster 11:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Other comments
I'm not sure either way. All i can say is it is a good article. Perhaps we should have a "Good Article" thingy as well as the "Featured Article" thing. Coz then we can have catagorys for these "OK" articles. who agrees? SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 11:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Agree
SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 11:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
