Talk:Chief: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(fair enough)
Line 9: Line 9:
:::Not notable. Seriously. I caught one once, (forgotten how :~() and most GLITCH Pokémon have there own pages, so this one should. PS i agree with Maxim, all PBR trainers are stubs! [[User:SpecialK|SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch]] 13:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Not notable. Seriously. I caught one once, (forgotten how :~() and most GLITCH Pokémon have there own pages, so this one should. PS i agree with Maxim, all PBR trainers are stubs! [[User:SpecialK|SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch]] 13:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
::::It is a beta trainer class, so maybe it should stay. As for PBR trainer classes, if it has all possible information and is still a stub, maybe a list is needed, like how many items have received. However, [[Jacred]] is a glitch and should be deleted as it has been merged. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 13:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
::::It is a beta trainer class, so maybe it should stay. As for PBR trainer classes, if it has all possible information and is still a stub, maybe a list is needed, like how many items have received. However, [[Jacred]] is a glitch and should be deleted as it has been merged. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 13:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::Yeah. I agree with deleting Jacred. Can someone investigate the "catching side of it? It has the same back sprite as charmander and has the moveset of a Wartortle, but with [[Super Glitch]] at level, hmmm, can't remember. [[User:SpecialK|SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch]] 13:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:40, 7 February 2010

What is going on???? This is madness. Why delete? I mean, give me 3 good reasons! SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Because this information is on the Glitch Trainer article now. Just like it says in the deletion template. -Sketch 13:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not stupid, i looked there. But it was better as this seperate article!! SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  1. It has all of its information on another page.
  2. It is a stub.
  3. It is not very notable.

There are your 3 good reasons. --SnorlaxMonster 13:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Chief isn't a glitch. It's a beta Trainer Class actually. I'd prefer to keep it. all those PBR Trainer Classes are also eternal stubs. --Maxim 13:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Not notable. Seriously. I caught one once, (forgotten how :~() and most GLITCH Pokémon have there own pages, so this one should. PS i agree with Maxim, all PBR trainers are stubs! SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
It is a beta trainer class, so maybe it should stay. As for PBR trainer classes, if it has all possible information and is still a stub, maybe a list is needed, like how many items have received. However, Jacred is a glitch and should be deleted as it has been merged. --SnorlaxMonster 13:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. I agree with deleting Jacred. Can someone investigate the "catching side of it? It has the same back sprite as charmander and has the moveset of a Wartortle, but with Super Glitch at level, hmmm, can't remember. SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)