User talk:SnorlaxMonster: Difference between revisions

User talk:SnorlaxMonster (view source)

907 bytes added , 15 May 2020

Disassembly source question

54

edits

@@ Line 1,689: / Line 1,689: @@
 :Emulated games are usually fine. However, I would urge caution when using them as a source for any kind of glitch behaviour. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 08:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 ::Alright, thanks. I'll be careful in case the effects may involve a glitch. [[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 15:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
+== Disassembly source ==
+I recently decided to investigate some of the Gen II and III game mechanics (and contribute/discuss if it is relevant). I was immediately pulled into the disassembly / source code projects [https://github.com/pret/ here]. I have noticed that these projects are referenced/discussed a lot on BP, so I should assume that it is reliable, am I correct? I guess I am not entirely familiar with the background and origin of the project.
+Also, if I do contribute (either supervised or not), should I explicitly include a reference to the code (either in text or using "ref"? I have seen it a few times (searching for "disassembly" on BP), but it is clearly not the norm. I have seen other articles where "only the official media counts". How 'official' are the disassemblies then? Thank you. [[User:Rarecandybar|Rarecandybar]] ([[User talk:Rarecandybar|talk]]) 10:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)