User talk:Terryberry94: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 36: Line 36:
Hey, just so you know, we do not need to state which of Ash's Pokemon is powerful as it can be biased and opinionated. Also, we avoid making similarities to Ash other Pokemon, it is not notable as the writer often repeat personalities for Ash's Pokemon. Also, do not revert an admin, if you have a problem with their edit, bring it up to their talk page.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#025DA6">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#5A96C5">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EA1A3E">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#F16A81">ire</span>]] 01:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey, just so you know, we do not need to state which of Ash's Pokemon is powerful as it can be biased and opinionated. Also, we avoid making similarities to Ash other Pokemon, it is not notable as the writer often repeat personalities for Ash's Pokemon. Also, do not revert an admin, if you have a problem with their edit, bring it up to their talk page.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#025DA6">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#5A96C5">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EA1A3E">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#F16A81">ire</span>]] 01:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
:As an addition to the message posted above, the staff have deemed many of the edits you've been making (both to talk pages and the personality and characteristics sections of pages) unnecessary. Like stated earlier, adding the "power level" of Pokémon is very difficult to do without bias, which we strive not to have in our articles. Furthermore, some of the alterations you've made to the pages have made the information a little difficult to understand. Articles should flow cohesively, so certain chunks shouldn't be sounding different than another, that's why some of your edits have been reverted, because it sounded out of place.  If an edit of yours gets reverted or changed, do not become personally offended, as that is part of the collaborative nature of a wiki. Now, you've been asked to stop with the aforementioned edits, if you continue it may lead to a block. Please keep this in mind during future editing. Thank you. '''''[[User:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">--Pokemaster</span>]][[User talk:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">97</span>]]''''' 02:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
:As an addition to the message posted above, the staff have deemed many of the edits you've been making (both to talk pages and the personality and characteristics sections of pages) unnecessary. Like stated earlier, adding the "power level" of Pokémon is very difficult to do without bias, which we strive not to have in our articles. Furthermore, some of the alterations you've made to the pages have made the information a little difficult to understand. Articles should flow cohesively, so certain chunks shouldn't be sounding different than another, that's why some of your edits have been reverted, because it sounded out of place.  If an edit of yours gets reverted or changed, do not become personally offended, as that is part of the collaborative nature of a wiki. Now, you've been asked to stop with the aforementioned edits, if you continue it may lead to a block. Please keep this in mind during future editing. Thank you. '''''[[User:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">--Pokemaster</span>]][[User talk:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">97</span>]]''''' 02:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't understand why can't we discus pokemon power. Can we just all just chat about it what's the big deal. Why people on this site are not allowed or they just don't see it's not really important. But the thing I don't understand ash plapitoad and krockidial are powerhouse why not pignite, snorlax, skeptial, charizard, and donphan. I understand not pikachu is not powerhouse. --[[User:Terryberry94|Terryberry94]] ([[User talk:Terryberry94|talk]]) 03:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
130

edits

Navigation menu