37
edits
Talk:Zoroark (Pokémon)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
→i have an issue
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
::::::...Misdreavus isn't green...? <small>(Well okay, now that I look at it I guess it's kind of teal. :P)</small> | ::::::...Misdreavus isn't green...? <small>(Well okay, now that I look at it I guess it's kind of teal. :P)</small> | ||
::::::But anyway, I wasn't saying that Pokemon are ''never'' based on European myths; that would be just ignorant. XD My point was that if a Pokemon is significantly similar to a well-known Japanese mythological figure, but is also slightly similar to some western myth... chances are high that the true origin is the Japanese one. :P <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 14:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | ::::::But anyway, I wasn't saying that Pokemon are ''never'' based on European myths; that would be just ignorant. XD My point was that if a Pokemon is significantly similar to a well-known Japanese mythological figure, but is also slightly similar to some western myth... chances are high that the true origin is the Japanese one. :P <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 14:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Even so, but based on the myths, the kitsune was mischievous, not evil like the black fox. (the Dark types japanese name is Evil type) so it is more likely based on the BF. (i am not one to give up easily) | |||
