Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/Pokemaniac102

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Support (3)

  • Agree. A simply Marvelous user. Vast Experience, and his user relations are more than adequate.--DCM((Nag at Me!Edits))
  • Agree. He makes great anime edits.--KukiTalk 01:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • I changed my vote to support after realizing that PM102 is here more than I thought. Chocolate 02:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • He's been here for a while and he knows what he's doing...good help.--Tavisource 15:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (10)

  • Disagree. He has said himself that he loses interest in Pokémon very easily. I don't really want another shaky admin who might not be here the next day. MaverickNate 01:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. Like above, he says that he loses interest sometimes as well as he won't be on as much. Sounds like a hit or miss candidate and maybe now is not the right time. --HoennMaster 01:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. See above comments, that and i don't notice him edit much at the moment...err...or that might just be me not noticing things again -____-' ~~Takoto| サソデイ 01:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. Annoyed one user into leaving Bulbapedia for good. Also, he's not online very often due to High School. What's the use of granting powers to someone who's barely online? Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links 07:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. For reasons stated and from my observation too.--Kevzo8 09:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. I'll have to agree. He has an attitude on some people, such as the talk about Glatra...he spoke REALLY harsh against the user. ht14 19:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose Have to agree here, during the Glatra incident he did show a very bad attitude, and it was definitely not right for him to act like that. - Kogoro | Talk to me | 19:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Now that I hear about the fact that he made a user leave for good, I change my vote to oppose. Chocolate 22:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • He did what? Who was it? BTW, this is my vote 4 now.--Kkllnn blastoise 22:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. A self-proclaimed "inactive user." Obviously, we don't want an inactive user as an admin. Also, a major userspace abuser before the ban. --ニョロトノ666 03:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

I'm neutral, and here's why: Yes, PM102 does make a lot of good edits. But, he said himself that he won't be on as much as he was in the past. Admins should be on every day, and if he's not gonna be on every day, he might not do good as an admin. So yeah, I'm neutral and that's why. Chocolate 01:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm right here you know! Well, I don't edit much, but I' am ALMOST ALWAYS online, when I can be.~Ποκεμανιακα0β 01:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
This sucks, haha. I'm here almost all the time, that I am at home... And plus, there are some other users that are here less than me~Ποκεμανιακα0β 14:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
To Kkllnn...it's not that important, but if you REALLY want to know, it's here... ht14 23:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
OK, call me an idiot if you want, but I can't find it.--Kkllnn blastoise 23:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Never mind then... ht14 23:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
If you're talking about Darkrai breeder, he already made edits to some pages today.--Kkllnn blastoise 23:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
....~Ποκεμανιακα0β 23:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

From what I can see, PM102 left Bulbapedia for good a couple days ago. I think this should be archived. Chocolate 03:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Um, no. It gets archived after a month. Period. --ニョロトノ666 03:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
But if he's not ever gonna be here again, he'll never been an admin, and I don't see any use pro-longing the rejection. Chocolate 03:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)