User talk:TwinsMetsFan: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→No!: new section) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::Over at Wikipedia, the adminship process (known there as RFA) is mostly question-based, where four default questions involving adminship (along the same vein as what will you do if the RFA is successful) are asked immediately upon filing an adminship request. Then, any other user can come and ask questions about anything else, such as policy, attitude, contributions, etc. The answers provided to the questions can literally make the difference between a successful RFA and a failed RFA, as I've seen RFAs turn on a dime based on one good or bad answer. Below that is a voting section, which is pretty similar to the process here upon looking at it. Most of the questions I had to answer were fairly straightforward, as were my answers, which resulted in a nearly unanimous successful RFA (~50 +, 4 -). The only opposes stemmed from totally random things, like what userboxes I had on my page and my participation in {{wp|WP:SRNC|a hotly contentious naming conventions poll}}. --[[User:TwinsMetsFan|'''<font color="#CC0018">T</font><font color="#0000C0">M</font>F''']] <sup>[[User talk:TwinsMetsFan|Let's Go Mets]] - [[Special:Contributions/TwinsMetsFan|Stats]]</sup> 02:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | :::Over at Wikipedia, the adminship process (known there as RFA) is mostly question-based, where four default questions involving adminship (along the same vein as what will you do if the RFA is successful) are asked immediately upon filing an adminship request. Then, any other user can come and ask questions about anything else, such as policy, attitude, contributions, etc. The answers provided to the questions can literally make the difference between a successful RFA and a failed RFA, as I've seen RFAs turn on a dime based on one good or bad answer. Below that is a voting section, which is pretty similar to the process here upon looking at it. Most of the questions I had to answer were fairly straightforward, as were my answers, which resulted in a nearly unanimous successful RFA (~50 +, 4 -). The only opposes stemmed from totally random things, like what userboxes I had on my page and my participation in {{wp|WP:SRNC|a hotly contentious naming conventions poll}}. --[[User:TwinsMetsFan|'''<font color="#CC0018">T</font><font color="#0000C0">M</font>F''']] <sup>[[User talk:TwinsMetsFan|Let's Go Mets]] - [[Special:Contributions/TwinsMetsFan|Stats]]</sup> 02:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Apparently that went down the tubes. Eh whatever. --[[User:TwinsMetsFan|'''<font color="#CC0018">T</font><font color="#0000C0">M</font>F''']] <sup>[[User talk:TwinsMetsFan|Let's Go Mets]] - [[Special:Contributions/TwinsMetsFan|Stats]]</sup> 15:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | Apparently that went down the tubes. Eh whatever. --[[User:TwinsMetsFan|'''<font color="#CC0018">T</font><font color="#0000C0">M</font>F''']] <sup>[[User talk:TwinsMetsFan|Let's Go Mets]] - [[Special:Contributions/TwinsMetsFan|Stats]]</sup> 15:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
== No! == | |||
Don't leave! You ''are'' wanted here! You make great contributions! [[User:Chocolate|<font color="6D351A">Chocolate</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Chocolate|<font color="6D351A">Chat with Me</font>]])</small> 21:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:16, 21 January 2009
Archives: July 2006 – September 2008
Well?
Did I do it right this time? I'm dreadful with coding... --ニョロトノ666 20:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Looks good to me for the most part. There's an extra "|-" in there since the original row indicator wasn't deleted, but based on my prior experiences with wikicode at Wikipedia, that won't hurt anything, so we're good to go. Thanks a bunch. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations!
You've been nominated for adminship! By me! Use Template:User Admin Candidate on your userpage to increase traffic. --ニョロトノ666 23:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Hopefully it won't be as rough as the adminship process at Wikipedia (I succeeded there, but it was rough nonetheless...) --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- What has to happen there? MoldyOrange 01:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Over at Wikipedia, the adminship process (known there as RFA) is mostly question-based, where four default questions involving adminship (along the same vein as what will you do if the RFA is successful) are asked immediately upon filing an adminship request. Then, any other user can come and ask questions about anything else, such as policy, attitude, contributions, etc. The answers provided to the questions can literally make the difference between a successful RFA and a failed RFA, as I've seen RFAs turn on a dime based on one good or bad answer. Below that is a voting section, which is pretty similar to the process here upon looking at it. Most of the questions I had to answer were fairly straightforward, as were my answers, which resulted in a nearly unanimous successful RFA (~50 +, 4 -). The only opposes stemmed from totally random things, like what userboxes I had on my page and my participation in a hotly contentious naming conventions poll. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- What has to happen there? MoldyOrange 01:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Apparently that went down the tubes. Eh whatever. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
No!
Don't leave! You are wanted here! You make great contributions! Chocolate (Chat with Me) 21:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
