User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 70710-100710
|This page contains material that may not be suitable for young readers.|
Viewer discretion is advised.
Talk page archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Talk pages for Robot Chicken skit guides: Pokémon Bloopers Pikachu Secret
The goal of Encyclopaediae Pokémonis is to be just as international as Pokémon itself, and helping aspiring Pokémon wikis in languages we don't yet have is a great way to help achieve that goal. However, if we don't even know who the possible aspirers for Encyclopaediae Pokémonis's ninth language even are, there's no way any growth can take place. If you speak or understand a language that's currently not represented in Encyclopaediae Pokémonis and happen to find a wiki in that language with aspirations to join Encyclopaediae Pokémonis, then don't hesitate to drop me a line. Remember, an aspirier can't grow if they remain sheltered from the world!
If you understand Brazilian Portuguese, or know someone who does, then the Portuguese arm of Encyclopaediae Pokémonis is in desperate need of your assistance. Many, if not all, of that wiki's articles are in dire need of improvement, be it massive cleanup or even adding some real content to begin with. Their sysops are never around to handle things, and their interwiki bot has done nothing since late September--of 2008. The fact that a trusted member of Encyclopaediae Pokémonis has fallen into such disrepair is disturbing, to say the least. Brazilians do not deserve quality this low. If you can help improve the Portuguese end, then I highly recommend you do so. Today.
|This is a talk page archive.
It contains old discussions of topics relating to the user. Please do not add or remove any content from it.
[[Well, I understand where you're coming from, and I get that it was wrong to delete his talk page. I was just angry at HIM deleting MY page. Honestly, if you aren't willing to allow your users to edit content, and instead have this militaristic domination of all pages on the wiki, then I guess this place isn't as welcoming as I first thought. Perhaps this site would be in better hands if it were run by people past the age of fifteen.]] / jerkish rampage
I'm so sorry about that. It was totally unfair to you, and I was just venting. I feel terrible about it. I know you were just enforcing rules and doing your job. I really hope you can accept my apology. EarthKwake 22:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Apology accepted. Trust me, if someone less forgiving had been the one to handle things, you might not have even gotten a chance to apologize. I for one hope that you can take what you've learned and put it to good use. --Shiningpikablu252 23:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Definitely. :] Thanks a bunch. ^^
Why did you remove the jpsetlink? Those need to be there, but I'm assuming you did it because I forgot to add it on gliscor when I updated it. Just making sure you know. MaverickNate 23:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- First time handling the new style. Mistakes will happen in such an instance. I'll try to get that parameter in from now on--but just for the record, every new-style page I've touched up to now that needed that parameter doesn't have it. --Shiningpikablu252 23:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Beginners on this site like me usually insert unproven information because they think that it was already known. The Compoundeyes ability for Tracey's Venonat was mentioned in the page for the ability itself.
Pattyman 19:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the "radar eyes" scene could easily fool people into thinking it was an actual ability. However, I highly doubt that those scenes could really be considered depictions of Compoundeyes since the concept of abilities in the games might not have hit the drawing board by the time the last "radar eyes" scene aired...--Shiningpikablu252 03:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
TDWT edit summaries
Could you maybe quit it with the edit summaries? I don't care for the show, but I know several people who get very upset by the spoilers you cram into your edit summaries when it hasn't yet aired in their timezone, and at least one of them has asked you to stop before. Would you mind listening to them, for courtesy's sake?02:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- OK, now I think we're going a bit far with this. I'll try to avoid spoilers next week...if there even is a proper elimination next week (if there isn't, the page won't be touched)...--Shiningpikablu252 03:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)