User talk:Naze

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 13:57, 3 April 2009 by Optimatum (talk | contribs) (Delete tag)
Jump to: navigation, search

Please use link templates. For an explanation on how and when, see shortlinks. TTEchidnaFire echyGSDS! 06:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Er, wait, scratch that. It was someone else who wasn't. Either way, use them. TTEchidnaFire echyGSDS! 06:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


Speculation has no place on encyclopedic pages. It doesn't matter how many followers a piece of speculation has, it doesn't belong on pages such as Jimmy (Johto) or Marina (Johto). For example, while many people believe Ash will get a Riolu egg from Riley, it's still speculation and has no place on the pages of Ash, Riolu, or Riley. Please refrain from inserting speculation where it doesn't belong. --Shiningpikablu252 04:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Again - don't speculate. Until there's official source, we don't know it's Rotom. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 13:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Fine, as long as you agree to remove the other speculation about Rotom being legendary or not. That too is claimed to be a speculation claim.Lanturn 08:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


Not trying to sound moany, but you really shouldn't put anything in an anime episode page until it airs. --HAH08 00:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page Comments

Please don't erase talk page comments for no reason. Trust me, you do NOT want to end up like Big Johnno, who got into an edit war with a sysop over comments the former had erased and was trying to keep erased. That user ended up blocked and subsequently had every erased comment restored. ---- MAGNEDETH 01:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


Stop re-adding information that is slated for removal as it was identified as unneeded article. Thank you. Kevzo8 13:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Look, To Be Continued is just a plain yellow text added at the end of every episode. It's not notable enough; it's present in any anime. Kevzo8 13:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
We already have an article on eyecathes.--FF(editstalk) 13:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
However, eyecatches isn't that large of an article. Besides, since I was responsible for it, I actually did the delete with "FINE" as a summary. Lanturn 13:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Blanking =/= deleting, you know. Otherwise anyone could delete articles, and this place would be a mess.--freezingCOLD (page, talk) 13:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
That's the problem, but if the writer did wrote it and then deleted it, then everyone would be fine with as though it didn't exist. Lanturn 13:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, you see, only admins have the power to delete articles. A deleted article will appear as a redlink when linked to. A balnk article will appear blue. There's a difference, you know.--freezingCOLD (page, talk) 13:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete tag

Is the only way the admins will know to delete it. If we don't delete it, the page takes up space and thus, Bulbapedia would be slower. So please stop blanking the page...ΘρtιmαtumTalk 13:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I did the delete myself. The reason I blanked it was so that my contribution of deleting it would be done by me. Since I was responsible of creating the article, I might as well remove it too. Lanturn 13:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC) edit warred just for that?! JEEZ, why don't just let someone else stick the delete tag on it? There's no reason to cause SEVERE SERVER LOAD [try saying that three times fast...] JUST TO PUT A DELETE TAG ON A PAGE. /sarcastic anger. ΘρtιmαtumTalk 13:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Only admin can delete articles. Unfortunately, you're not an admin. And blanking =/= deleting. Being the creator doesn't mean you can blank the page. Admin has the final say. Kevzo8 13:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)