User talk:Jello

Talk page archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

---

94!!!

Wow, i just made my first (not including failed one) whole page! can you review it and see if its ok? 94. Thanks! --Rsrdaman 02:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, Generation I glitch Pokémon that can only be obtained via Gameshark don't get articles. Also, a tip - if it says that a page has been deleted when you are creating it, you should ask before creating it. It may have been deleted because it was not notable. Werdnae (talk) 03:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

About adding trivia's

Hi, this is about that revert that you did on Caitlin's article. If it specifically says not to add trivia then why is there still some there? Are you going to remove all of them then? Or are you just saying that because you don't want my own one there?Blueknightex 07:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Do not add trivia, it doesn't say not to have it at all.—★Pika³³²³ 09:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

You're taking this way out of hand. I don't appreciate snippy attitude. I'm only doing my job and I can't help it if people don't read the top notice that's there on every single page you edit. Your trivia was pointless anyway since there are other parts of the trivia that repeat the same thing you said anyway. Good day. —♥ Jello^talk 17:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I am not being snippy or 'taking this out of hand'. Please stop it. I was only asking you a question why my edit has been reverted. Remember what theCode of Conduct says "Do not insult them, demean them..." I wasn't even insulting you. You don't have to call my trivia pointless. At least tell me that without accusing me of being 'snippy'. Not looking for a fight please. Just asking a question. Never mind. An admin has explained to me why no more trivia should be added. Have a nice day.. :( Blueknightex 07:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

You were being snippy with everyone you interacted with, and what you left on my talk page was snippy. Before you throw the Code of Conduct in someone's face, maybe you should read what you write as well. I have no business starting fights with anyone but when someone comes at me with an attitude like yours, especially after I went out of my to kindly tell you in my edit summary why your edit was reverted in the first place. I didn't even have to do that, because it clearly, in bold says to not add trivia, yet you did exactly that and when you were reverted, you started giving attitude to other people. So, that is taking things out of hand. When you are repeating information that's already there, it IS pointless, I'm not even insulting you so please don't take it the wrong way. Have a good day. —♥ Jello^talk 19:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)