User talk:Darynu

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 19:16, 11 July 2011 by Darynu (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search


Bulbapedia logo.png
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Darynu!

Here are a few links to help you get started:

The Manual of Style, or MoS, outlines the format of all pages on Bulbapedia.

Our friendly team of staff are here to help! Talk to them if you have any questions or problems with Bulbapedia.

On talk pages, please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), or by using the "Your signature with a timestamp" (button_sig.png) button at the top of the edit window.

On Bulbapedia, the ability to edit personal userpages is a privilege. Per our userpage policy, this must be earned by first making constructive edits to the mainspace. Once you can, remember to keep userspace edits (edits to User:Darynu) to a minimum.

For a complete list of policies and editing advice, please see the Welcome Portal.
 Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  Werdnae (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)  

Talk page comments

Please stop commenting on old discussions. Per the Talk page policy, you are not allowed to reply to messages older than 6 months. Thank you. Jo the Marten ಠ_ಠ 01:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Pokémon articles

Don't change the structure or wording from Pokémon articles. This section from Project Pokédex page says that you can't do so.--Den Zen 18:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


Is it just me or is it like I can't edit anything? this is supposed to be a wiki people! I understand not changing structure on Pokemon pages but i was changing the wording since it was making Treeko sound like a legendary Pokemon by using pronouns that apply to a single object, person, or creature, when it should be talking about multiple, as Treeko is a species, not an individual. What I am really angry about is that I cannot even comment on a talk page if the above comment was 6 months old! What was posted there was saying that a perfectly good piece was deleted because one guy thought that it wasn't true. I was only saying why it was still relevant and that I want it to be re-posted. I think the rules, while placed with good intentions, need to be used with a little more moderation. Especially the six month rule. Thank you for your time. Darynu 19:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)