User talk:CoolPikachu!/Archive 7

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
< User talk:CoolPikachu!
Revision as of 10:37, 17 January 2011 by ElectAbuzzzz (talk | contribs) (Rounds: new section)
Jump to: navigation, search
Talk Page Archives*: 1234567
395.png 026.png 154.png 260.png 468.png 579.png
Level 77 Level 77 Level 77 Level 77 Level 77 Level 77
Empoleon Raichu Meganium Swampert Togekiss Reuniclus


Can I get my userspace priveledges back? I've been working really hard to get it back. Pokedex493 22:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

It's only been a week. --CoolPikachu! 23:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
I know, but I did a lot of work in that short time. It's okay if you say no. Pokedex493 23:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Still not enough time though. Just be patient. --CoolPikachu! 03:02, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


Could you take a look at Kurumiru's article? Cuz i don't know how to revert.--Muk-a-matic-Maketh the Muk go round... 02:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Not what I meant.--Muk-a-matic-Maketh the Muk go round... 03:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I know what you meant but someone else got in the way and made a bigger mess. --CoolPikachu! 03:01, 2 January 2011


I think I made the bigger mess. x_x I'm not certain how, I just undid the edits...--Si6x12 03:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Webcomic Question

I was looking at the Super Effective article, and it talked about VG Cats. Shouldn't VG Cats have an article? I'm familiar with the comic so I could start on it if it should have an article. Pokedex493 02:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


Pokemonthief7 Did it again...Gave Dia's Pokémon fake English names. Block and Protect, Please--Muk-a-matic-Maketh the Muk go round... 02:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Eh, not yet. --CoolPikachu! 03:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Not exactly fake, just fanmade ones created by the guy who scanlates Pokespe, it's like Coronis' nicknames (fun fact: he called Don by that name before it became his official name when Chuang Yi released Vol. 34) Although I already did tell him that Tung wasn't official....Ataro 04:32, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
What about the editing of the manga images of the Pokémon being switched to the trainers? PattyMan 06:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Ah just don't freely talk about them like that v:. Editing for the what now? --CoolPikachu! 07:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
One of the edits was like this one. This did happen with the other characters as well. PattyMan 03:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, the user really doesn't listen to us...or reply so... --CoolPikachu! 04:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


I see your point, but Maverick Nate deleted it because it was nearly empty. And I recreated it so I could fill it up.TheRevived 23:30, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Beep....Beep....TheRevived 23:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
The page isn't really *needed* on the site because the pages themselves already have the demographics. But if you want to challenge the pages notability, go ahead. --CoolPikachu! 23:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeh, but I think it would be good if we put all these little facts together in one page.TheRevived 23:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Bloop....Bloop....TheRevived 23:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Is protecting the page from creation your response?TheRevived 23:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Yeah please, stop that it's a bit irritating having to be edit conflicted while have wiki errors happening. I'll go talk with the other uppers and see what they think. Protecting the page was not my response but to show if an admin deletes a page, it's not a good idea to keep recreating it. --CoolPikachu! 23:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
it isnt needed. also, please dont spam talk pages with unnecessary comments. -- MAGNEDETH 23:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
It would be a nice peice of trivia though --Pokemaster97 23:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

So Mag, could we just replace the individual info bits with a "Main Article: Demographics" thing, right? TheRevived 00:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Deth just said the page isn't needed. --CoolPikachu! 00:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
But Could I propose an alternative. I mean not supplementing, but replacing.TheRevived 00:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Wow He's already said no so just drop it okay? --Pokemaster97 00:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

He answered the supplementation question, not the replacemant question.TheRevived 01:00, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


This. Regarding this. Thoughts? --electAbuzzzz 10:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)