|
So yeah.
Finished. Speaking of which, what's your opinion on an "Bill (Adventures)" article that I mentioned before? Was thinking of him being the second most recurring character, after Oak, and having a (semi)huge impact on the plot, once again, like Oak. Ataro 01:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, and I was wondering if you looked at Hikaru Wazana's article for Lax. Ataro 01:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- My opinion is, that Bill is notable enough. I'd say anyone at this point who has appeared in every arc from Kanto, that's notable by doing something affecting theplot, can get one...more or less. As for Lax, it looks pretty good. --☆CoolPikachu! 02:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- O hai, more stuff and a template. Four members have been revealed so far, so I guess that's enough for a mainspace..I think If it's good enough, then I'll add the other names to it....Ataro 22:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- For now, I'd put the Great Gavel template on hold. Great work on the others as always, etc :). --☆CoolPikachu! 07:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Togebo, finished. I'd probably have more to add...but stuff probably won't come out until it's collected into volumes...Ataro 08:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Good work but, I can't remember. Did Togebo have a CY nickname? I haven't read Adventures in a while, so. --☆CoolPikachu! 04:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, it was Togetaro at first...but in volume 15 it was Totaro. I assumed that was a mistake and just gave him the most used one. Ataro 06:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Shadow Triad masks
I'm just asking how the fact that Shadow Triad's masks look exactly like the monkeys' faces is an opinion? It's a pure fact. If it were an opinion, we should remove Physiology sections from Pokémon articles and hair/eye color parameters from {{CharacterInfobox}}, because it would be an opinion that Pikachu's tail resembles a lightning bolt or that Whitney's hair color is pink.--電禅Den Zen 17:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- The same way the Lake trio's puddles look like the heads of the dragon trio: you see what you want of it. People claim its fact and swear they see it, and others things they're looking too much into it. Even I see the mask connection and wouldn't put that line in there, since it is opinionated, because you assume its meant to be that way without proof there's a connection. If they reveal themselves to be the triplets, then that line can and should be included. In the meantime, it's more trivia than main article, if anything at all. Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 18:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I actually agree now that it's more like trivia and shouldn't be added. But my point was that their resemblance is clear and objective, unlike resemblance between the puddle shapes and the dragons.--電禅Den Zen 18:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- It was my original intention to make it trivia, but I was told by Deth to make it part of the main article as he found it too important to simply be trivia (In his words: "im not sure it needs to be trivia. it seems pretty honest that the masks are based on them"). But I don't care if it's in trivia, or the main article, I still feel it should be pointed out somewhere on the page. I think maybe we ought to take this to the page itself, rather than on CP's talk page. (Sorry CP ♥) ★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 18:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hm...I have to agree with Deth. It just can't be completely ignored. Adventures hints lots of things, like Sird's true team and Regigigas's capture. And because the Editor-in-chief said Jo can add it, shouldn't we keep it anyway?--電禅Den Zen 19:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Den Zen, those examples you just gave are way more far fetched. Colors cannot *really* be opinion (but this isn't the discussion for colors.) As Luna says, everyone sees what they want. The masks look like it, but it's far fetched to claim it to be the monkeys, despites its apparent appearance. It's still an opinion, and should be included if there is an actual motivation behind this i.e, Triad having the monkeys in the manga or stating the basis and whatnot. I'd have to talk to Deth to reassure to see its notability as trivia to stay on the page. But until then, no trivia is to be put on for now. --☆CoolPikachu! 20:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused
Hi, sorry if this isn't the right place ( or person) to ask, but today I posted on Raikou's talk page, about the trivia and someone removed my comment without explanation, as you can see in the history here http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Raikou_(Pok%C3%A9mon)&action=history
If I did something wrong I'm sorry,I'm sort of new, and it said if I had any questions to ask a staff member soo....--Spongeenthusiast 02:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. But you're not allowed to reply to comments that are 6 months old or older. I kind pressed the save button before I put it in... Ataro 02:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Any staff member is a good person to ask about these things :). As for that, Ataro removed the comment as he stated. We do not allow discussions from 6+ months ago to be continued. If anything, it can be restarted but not under the same section. --☆CoolPikachu! 03:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Archiving talk pages
I did not know that this banner is important (I know the content...). How do I archive? --  Questions? -- 14:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- You move the page to User talk:Pokémon/Archive 1. Also please remove the image from your signature we have a rule against images in sigs now. Thanks! --☆CoolPikachu! 21:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
|
