User talk:Aura-Knight: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:


For a full crash course on link templates, look at the {{bp|list of link templates}}.  --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 15:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
For a full crash course on link templates, look at the {{bp|list of link templates}}.  --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 15:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
==Handheld system==
The following is a reply to your comment that "Gold and silver were planned for the Game Boy and there's no sign of a DS successor in sight for at least another three years, by which we'll likely be in a new region.":
A few months ago, it would have been somewhat acceptable to claim that Generation V could be released for the DS. Now, however, after no new Pokémon have debuted in the latest movie, it is clear that Generation IV will be longer than its predecessors, rather than shorter. It might be hard to fathom that it will take another three years until the next generation is launched (seeing as Nintendo has said that the DS successor will only be released in 2011), but that is exactly the impression that has been created.
Allow me to clarify: According to Nintendo's reports, the DS will not be replaced until 2011. If Generation V were released for the DS, it would be first announced next year and released in 2010. By that time, the DS successor would be announced, and so the Pokémon enthusiasts would be demotivated to buy that new platform upon its release in 2011. The third game could be released thereafter for the newest platform, but that would necessarily remove battle compatibility with the main versions of the generation. It would be terrible for Nintendo, if to put it mildly.
You might for some reason say that it could be released next year, but that possibility has already been eliminated due to the continued focus on Generation IV and the lack of new Pokémon buzz. Besides which, the improved technology introduced in a new handheld system is the bread and butter of a new Pokémon generation. There seems to be a misconception that new Pokémon and regions serve that role, but those have long ceased to be re-defining or even innovative. It cannot be overstated that had it not been for the DS, Diamond and Pearl would have barely stood out from Ruby, Sapphire, FireRed and LeafGreen; they would simply not have warranted the use of the term "Generation IV".
In conclusion, the pattern whereby a new generation is released for a new handheld system, is well worth stating on the [[Future generations of Pokémon|relevant page]]. --[[User:Unown Lord|Unown Lord]]

Revision as of 14:23, 1 September 2008

Welcome

Welcome to Bulbapedia, Aura-Knight!

As a new user, you may wish to learn a few things that will be useful in your editing:

  • For a basic overview of wiki code, see this page.
  • The manual of style is very important. Make sure to read it. It outlines all official policies of Bulbapedia.
  • The word Pokémon is spelled with a capital P and an accented é. The P, of course, is accessed easily by holding Shift and pressing the P key, while the é can be accessed using Alt + 130 or Alt + 0233 on a Windows computer, and Option + e, then e again on a Mac. Otherwise, you can click it in the character palette below the editbox.
  • The word Poké Ball is spelled as two words. The "Poké" part is identical to the four beginning letters in "Pokémon"; "Ball" is spelled with a captial B (which is, again, accessed by holding Shift and pressing the B key). The spelling "Pokéball" arises frequently, but is incorrect.
  • The word "you" and all forms of it should not be used on encyclopedic pages unless it is a quote from Pokémon media. Bulbapedia is an encyclopedia, not a walkthrough.
  • On talk pages, please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
  • The use of link templates is official policy. For an explanation on their use, see the page on shortlinks.
  • If you happen to spot a vandal in the recent changes that has not been dealt with, please see this page for how to deal with it.
  • A list of pages that are linked to, but have not been created, can be found at this page. A list of short articles that may require more information can be found here, while a list of articles that need improvement can be found here.
  • If you want to make a page about a character you made up, please create it at User:Aura-Knight/(name), not merely (name). Bulbapedia's main namespace is reserved for actual, official Pokémon, items, characters, and locations. Also, please try to make sure that subpages are not categorized by templates used within.
  • A list of the admins that you can contact in case of a problem, can be found here.

Thank you, and have a good time editing here! Tina δ281 03:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Swinub, and MORE

No speculation is allowed like what you put on Berlitz. No speculation like Dawn's Swinub. HEY! IT CAN BE ANYONES!PokeManiac102 16:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Where arwe you getting all of this information?Emperor's Cookies 17:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Platinum

No problem, I didn't see the story. My mistake. Porygon-Z 19:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Link templates

You have to use them, seriously. No exceptions to the rule. None. It's like rules 34 and 35. Okay? TTEchidna 07:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Come on, you should know this by now! Read the shortlinks page if you still don't get it. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 06:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Almia

I wanted to check with you before I changed anything, but where was it said that Almia and Sinnoh are connected and that Almia is south of Lake Verity?

----HoennMaster 04:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Type

Don't write out something like [[Dragon-type]], as that links to a redirect. We have a link template for that, so write {{type2|Dragon}} instead. It'll get you the same thing. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 20:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Link Templates

Please use link templates when linking to stuff such as Pokémon names, attacks, and the like. For example, {{a|Rough Skin}} instead of just [[Rough Skin]]. This is so you don't unintentionally link to a disambiguation page.

For a full crash course on link templates, look at the list of link templates. --Shiningpikablu252 15:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Handheld system

The following is a reply to your comment that "Gold and silver were planned for the Game Boy and there's no sign of a DS successor in sight for at least another three years, by which we'll likely be in a new region.":

A few months ago, it would have been somewhat acceptable to claim that Generation V could be released for the DS. Now, however, after no new Pokémon have debuted in the latest movie, it is clear that Generation IV will be longer than its predecessors, rather than shorter. It might be hard to fathom that it will take another three years until the next generation is launched (seeing as Nintendo has said that the DS successor will only be released in 2011), but that is exactly the impression that has been created.

Allow me to clarify: According to Nintendo's reports, the DS will not be replaced until 2011. If Generation V were released for the DS, it would be first announced next year and released in 2010. By that time, the DS successor would be announced, and so the Pokémon enthusiasts would be demotivated to buy that new platform upon its release in 2011. The third game could be released thereafter for the newest platform, but that would necessarily remove battle compatibility with the main versions of the generation. It would be terrible for Nintendo, if to put it mildly.

You might for some reason say that it could be released next year, but that possibility has already been eliminated due to the continued focus on Generation IV and the lack of new Pokémon buzz. Besides which, the improved technology introduced in a new handheld system is the bread and butter of a new Pokémon generation. There seems to be a misconception that new Pokémon and regions serve that role, but those have long ceased to be re-defining or even innovative. It cannot be overstated that had it not been for the DS, Diamond and Pearl would have barely stood out from Ruby, Sapphire, FireRed and LeafGreen; they would simply not have warranted the use of the term "Generation IV".

In conclusion, the pattern whereby a new generation is released for a new handheld system, is well worth stating on the relevant page. --Unown Lord