Template talk:DL

Would you all approve if this was used on the TCG? ^ht14 04:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Give an example of how it would be used. ^Maverick_Nate 04:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, for Butterfree, see the name? Instead of [[Butterfree (TCG)#Butterfree|Butterfree]], use {{DL|Butterfree (TCG)|Butterfree}}... ^ht14 04:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't see why that would be needed. No link templates is easier to change and handle, plus I don't want to have another "edit every page" project ever again: that is used on every page and is fine the way it is. ^Maverick_Nate 04:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Just an idea to throw to the crowd, that's all. ^ht14 04:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

And of course, you could just do {{TCG|Butterfree}}. Nothing should be able to prevent readers from scrolling down a little bit. ~ sol 04:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Nope. It's different. ^ht14 04:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Nooo... There's hardly any difference between Butterfree and Butterfree if you click the links. It's the same page except one's scrolled down a bit further. ~ sol 04:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

It must scrool down farther to wherever it is talking about. For example: There is a difference between "Aura's Lucario" and just plain "Lucario". It schools to whichever is more appropriate for the link. ^Maverick_Nate 04:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

There... ^ht14 04:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna not do any edits for this crap on the TCG pages becaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaause those are getting a mega update in March or sooner. We're just not starting it quite yet because it's a 4000-page endeavor. TTEchidna 04:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

But is it an idea worth considering? ^ht14 04:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)