Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Catch/entry1"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Idea: adding Japanese Blue Version)
(Response/duplicated)
Line 44: Line 44:
   
 
Any thoughts or second opinions? [[User:PalletTownie|PalletTownie]] ([[User talk:PalletTownie|talk]]) 03:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 
Any thoughts or second opinions? [[User:PalletTownie|PalletTownie]] ([[User talk:PalletTownie|talk]]) 03:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
+
:Sorry, if I had realized this page wasn't locked, I probably would have responded sooner to at least have a tempering voice.
== Idea: adding Japanese Blue Version ==
+
:I'm honestly not sure we should care about Japanese Blue enough to put it in our tables. We're a wiki for the English games. The Japanese Blue games are very explicitly Japanese only; while it's easy enough for us to note a few differences here and there, like trades, I'm inclined to think that it's not worth it for us (again, an English wiki) to record ALL Japanese Blue encounters. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 06:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 
Since some talks on pages about Generation I areas mention differences for the Japanese Blue Version, and since this is an encyclopedia, it might be a good idea to add a column about the wild Pokemon for that particular version.
 
 
Originally, I was thinking of adding a green column "G" for the Japanese Green/US Blue and making the current blue column "B" the Japanese Blue (which would match the table on Game-exclusive Pokémon for Gen I), but that might be a little confusing, especially for people new to Pokemon. Plus it might require a disclaimer like on the paged noted. So instead it might be better to add another blue-colored column with "B(J)", which would be easier for readers to understand.
 
 
Of course this would mean having to go through Kanto locations pages to update Gen I Pokemon, but with help from the Japanese Bulbapedia it should be a smoother, albeit somewhat lengthy, task.
 
 
Any thoughts or second opinions? [[User:PalletTownie|PalletTownie]] ([[User talk:PalletTownie|talk]]) 20:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 
 
Sorry! Did not mean to post this twice, please comment on the first post I made and disregard this one! [[User:PalletTownie|PalletTownie]] ([[User talk:PalletTownie|talk]]) 20:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 06:15, 30 October 2015

Japanese Blue

Location info can be found here]. Vuvuzela2010 08:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I have an idea

Instead of separating by generation, can we make a catch entry template that merges all of Kanto's games? It can look something like this.

001 Bulbasaur
R B Y G S C FR LG HG SS
Grass Grass
1 100%

Hopefully this can work with the Pokémon that appear in all four generations with Kanto with the same rarity. - unsigned comment from SeanWheeler (talkcontribs)

Considering the differences in rarities, the fact that some games use night and day, the level differences, etc. this would be a huge mess of a template without some sort of fixing. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 22:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I also have an idea, this one about Japanese Blue

Since some talks on pages about Generation I areas mention differences for the Japanese Blue Version, and since this is an encyclopedia, it might be a good idea to add a column about the wild Pokemon for that particular version.

Originally, I was thinking of adding a green column "G" for the Japanese Green/US Blue and making the current blue column "B" the Japanese Blue (which would match the table on Game-exclusive Pokémon for Gen I, but that might be a little confusing, especially for people new to Pokemon. Plus it might require a disclaimeer like on the above page to explain. So instead it might be better to add another blue-colored column with "B(J)", which would be easier for readers to understand.

Of course this would mean having to go through Kanto locations pages to update Gen I Pokemon, but with help from the Japanese Bulbapedia it should be a smoother, albeit time-consuming task.

Any thoughts or second opinions? PalletTownie (talk) 03:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, if I had realized this page wasn't locked, I probably would have responded sooner to at least have a tempering voice.
I'm honestly not sure we should care about Japanese Blue enough to put it in our tables. We're a wiki for the English games. The Japanese Blue games are very explicitly Japanese only; while it's easy enough for us to note a few differences here and there, like trades, I'm inclined to think that it's not worth it for us (again, an English wiki) to record ALL Japanese Blue encounters. Tiddlywinks (talk) 06:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)