Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zing Zap (move)"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
('Variations of Waterfall': new section)
 
('Variations of Waterfall')
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
How is it related Waterfall, or any of the other attacks in that box? Poison Jab poisons, not flinches, so they can't be in the same category. [[User:Pallukun|Pallukun]] ([[User talk:Pallukun|talk]]) 23:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 
How is it related Waterfall, or any of the other attacks in that box? Poison Jab poisons, not flinches, so they can't be in the same category. [[User:Pallukun|Pallukun]] ([[User talk:Pallukun|talk]]) 23:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
  +
:The important thing is that it inflicts status of some sort, and not necessarily the same status. <small>- ''unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])'' </small> 00:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  +
::Then should the vast majority of attacks be in that list? A whole bunch of moves cause status ailments. It just seems like an entirely moot thing to note, considering that's just how most attacks work. They aren't thematically similar either, so why bother at all? [[User:Pallukun|Pallukun]] ([[User talk:Pallukun|talk]]) 22:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  +
:::Moves are considered variations when they have the same base power and similar PP and aditional effects. Take a look at [[Move variations|this page]]. --[[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 02:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  +
::::A lot of those are really stretching the definition of variations but I'm not going to fight it any more [[User:Pallukun|Pallukun]] ([[User talk:Pallukun|talk]]) 18:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:53, 5 June 2019

'Variations of Waterfall'

How is it related Waterfall, or any of the other attacks in that box? Poison Jab poisons, not flinches, so they can't be in the same category. Pallukun (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

The important thing is that it inflicts status of some sort, and not necessarily the same status. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talkcontribs) 00:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Then should the vast majority of attacks be in that list? A whole bunch of moves cause status ailments. It just seems like an entirely moot thing to note, considering that's just how most attacks work. They aren't thematically similar either, so why bother at all? Pallukun (talk) 22:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Moves are considered variations when they have the same base power and similar PP and aditional effects. Take a look at this page. --Suic (talk) 02:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
A lot of those are really stretching the definition of variations but I'm not going to fight it any more Pallukun (talk) 18:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)