Difference between revisions of "Talk:Type/Type chart"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Outdated type charts: new section)
 
m (Outdated type charts)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Outdated type charts ==
 
== Outdated type charts ==
   
As someone who likes to go back and play Generations I (before Dark and Steel were added) and II-V (before Fairy was added), I believe those "previous type charts" should be added to this page, instead of on their own page referenced below the current chart. The "Type/Type_chart" page is considered Incomplete, anyway. Why was this separated? Can we put it back on [[Type chart]] so it can be more easily accessed? (I've also posted this on [[Type chart]]'s Talk page) - [[User:Poikins|<span style="color:#fc880d">'''poi'''</span>]][[User talk:Poikins|<span style="color:#ff3333">'''kins'''</span>]] 21:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
+
As someone who likes to go back and play Generations I (before Dark and Steel were added) and II-V (before Fairy was added), I believe those "previous type charts" should be added to [[Type chart]], instead of on their own page referenced below the current chart on that oage. The "Type/Type_chart" page is considered Incomplete, anyway. Why was this separated? Can we put it back on [[Type chart]] so it can be more easily accessed? (I've also posted this on [[Type chart]]'s Talk page) - [[User:Poikins|<span style="color:#fc880d">'''poi'''</span>]][[User talk:Poikins|<span style="color:#ff3333">'''kins'''</span>]] 21:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:33, 10 April 2016

Outdated type charts

As someone who likes to go back and play Generations I (before Dark and Steel were added) and II-V (before Fairy was added), I believe those "previous type charts" should be added to Type chart, instead of on their own page referenced below the current chart on that oage. The "Type/Type_chart" page is considered Incomplete, anyway. Why was this separated? Can we put it back on Type chart so it can be more easily accessed? (I've also posted this on Type chart's Talk page) - poikins 21:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)