Talk:Power
Still a stub?
Power is a stub that needs to be rectified. However, I think that it has gone beyond stub status. Does anyone agree? - unsigned comment from Samjohn95 (talk • contribs)
- Yeah, this is surely not a atub. Alpha CuboneKing 01:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I think I should remove the stub status. I have seen a lot smaller articles - and ones with less info - be non-stub. Samjohn95 01:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Changed "Type effectiveness"
The example was unsatisfactory, as Silver Wind would give STAB with Buterfree, a component not covered until later in the article. --Zeebra403 (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Power-Damage
I'm not sure about this, but I feel like there should be some way to make a power to actual damage dealt comparison. I know the amount of variables far exceeds that of what can be explained, but I, personally, have always wanted to know exactly how those two relate to each other. 8BitRevenge (talk) 03:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)8BitRevenge
Power-Damage
I'm not sure about this, but I feel like there should be some way to make a power to actual damage dealt comparison. I know the amount of variables far exceeds that of what can be explained, but I, personally, have always wanted to know exactly how those two relate to each other.
