Talk:Pokémon Ultra Sun and Ultra Moon

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 00:07, 17 June 2017 by Blueapple128 (talk | contribs) ((Tiny bit of) new info from June 15 CoroCoro: new section)
Jump to: navigation, search
001Bulbasaur.png This talkpage is only for discussion of the article itself!

As the subject of this article is recently released, information on the page may change rapidly. Please make absolutely sure that the information that you wish to add to the article is able to be confirmed independently by yourself or another Bulbapedia user or administrator.

Please take any other discussion or questions regarding the subject of the article to the Bulbagarden Forums, where you can discuss it freely with other members of the Bulbagarden community.

An admin can remove this template at his or her discretion.


I'm not autoconfirmed yet, so I can't upload them myself, but individual logos are available on Nintendo's website. We might want to use them as the infobox images to avoid redlinks. Nyargleblargle (talk) 15:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Infobox Colors

I think the Ultra Sun and Ultra Moon colors should be different from the Sun and Moon colors, as Ultra Sun is more red-orangish and Ultra Moon is more of a purple, at least in official media Superjustinbros. (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

These colors are just temporary. --Carmen (Talk | contribs) 16:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
The logo colors look identical to me. Nyargleblargle (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
How do I make color templates for them? It won't let me.--Hamfart
You don't. The admins will at some point. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

New Pokémon

Nintendo of Italy confirmed me that there won't be "new Pokémon", but "alternative Pokémon forms not seen before". In the communicate they received from TPCi this is written and that the text in the Direct were mistakenly translitterated. I believe the phrase in the text should be corrected..--Franky7 (talk) 19:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The only claim in the article about which Pokémon will appear is "The games will feature Pokémon that did not appear in Pokémon Sun and Moon", which is taken directly from what the Direct said. While it's clear that new forms are being introduced (from the Solgaleo/Necrozma and Lunala/Necrozma fusions), there hasn't been any mention of "new Pokémon" from what I've seen. What phrase should be corrected?
Haddady ~Straight Outta the Bag~ 19:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
I think it's clear that whoever wrote for the Direct intentionally made the "did not appear in Sun and Moon" clause as vague as possible, so that it can cover the possibilities of new Pokemon, new forms, or even just old Pokemon that weren't in the Alola Dex. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I referred to that phrase. I didn't mean that it says clearly there will be new Pokémon, I only suggested to changed it to specify that there will be new forms (this way, maybe: ""The games will feature new Pokémon forms that did not appear in Pokémon Sun and Moon""). And, yes Pumpkinking, maybe it was, but it sounds strangely that Nintendo itself received another note different from the one in the video, but everything can be.--Franky7 (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Box mascots

In the article they are labeled "Pokémon resembling Solgaleo" and "Pokémon resembling Lunala".

I think it would be a good idea to change those to "Pokémon resembling Solgaleo and Necrozma" and "Pokémon resembling Lunala and Necrozma". Rebmcr (talk) 19:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

(Tiny bit of) new info from June 15 CoroCoro

Technically June 15th's CoroCoro did reveal a tiny amount of new info for USUM: Pikachu in a cap gets a seventh form, Ash's hat from M20. Is this worth adding to the article? We even have a screenshot. Blueapple128 (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)