Talk:Pokémon Gold and Silver beta/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "Talk:Pokémon Gold and Silver beta/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1": old vote ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Support (1)===
====Support (8)====
*I liked this article. It was colorful and contained a lot of information. --[[User:Clarky13|Clarky]] 10:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*I liked this article. It was colorful and contained a lot of information. --[[User:Clarky13|Clarky]] 10:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*I agree. It's a very good article.--[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font><font color="#42528C">Racer</font>''']] [[User talk:RexRacer|'''<font color="#FF5A00"><small>''-talk''</small></font>''']] 15:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*I agree. It's a very good article.--[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font><font color="#42528C">Racer</font>''']] [[User talk:RexRacer|'''<font color="#FF5A00"><small>''-talk''</small></font>''']] 15:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*I like it. A nice historical look at the development and release of GS. At the time, of course, this was all new and novel, so there's a good reason to document it thoroughly. --[[User:Martonimos|((<font color="#008000">Marton</font>]] [[User talk:Martonimos|<font color="#50C878">imos</font>))]] 00:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
*[[Image:Spr_4d_132.png‎]] [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
*Its Totally Awesome.--[[User:David aipom|<span style="color:blue">''David Aipom''</span>]] [[User talk:David aipom|<span style="color:green"><small>(Talk to me)</small></span>]] 15:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
*I liked it, it showed what might've happened in GS and had a lot of informational pictures.--[[User:Hey1031|Hey1031]] 15:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
*[[Image:Spr_4d_132.png]] to {{u|Martonimos}}. [[User:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:black;">'''Alpha'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:blue;">'''Totodile'''</span>]] 23:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
* Support. It's a great article, and it shows in some light how the game was planned out to be. [[User:Takoto|<span style="color:#2E0854">~~<b>Takoto</b></span>]] - [[User_talk:Takoto|<span style="color:#F4C2C2">サソデイ]]</span> 23:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


===Object (1)===
====Object (5)====
*Meh. Seems kind of empty and not detailed to me. Maybe a bit more organization of pics, and I might choose it. [[User:Ht14|ht14]] 12:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*Meh. Seems kind of empty and not detailed to me. Maybe a bit more organization of pics, and I might choose it. [[User:Ht14|ht14]] 12:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--'''[[User:Mooites|Mooites]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Mooites|Talk to me, baby!]]</sup> 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--'''[[User:Mooites|Mooites]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Mooites|Talk to me, baby!]]</sup> 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
::What do you mean? Have you even visited it? This is the article talking about the beta, not a possible remake. --[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font><font color="#42528C">Racer</font>''']] [[User talk:RexRacer|'''<font color="#FF5A00"><small>''-talk''</small></font>''']] 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
*It's detailed and informative, but personally, I think someone might have overdid the pictures. If you could clean it up a bit more, I'll agree. [[User:JirachiWishmaker0802|JirachiWishmaker0802]] 00:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
*It doesn't seem to have enough substance to really merit being a featured article.  It's pretty, but it doesn't reach any standards of greatness. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 04:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
*Too flimsy a topic for an FA - not enough substance or attention-grabbing material within. [[User:NP Chilla|NP Chilla]] 09:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


===Other comments===
====Other comments====
*I tidied up the article, so it looks more readable. Tell me if you like it or if it looked better before. - [[User:Clarky13|<span style="color:#0000FF;">'''Clarky'''</span>]][[User talk:Clarky13|<span style="color:#000000;">'''13'''</span>]]

Latest revision as of 20:14, 2 July 2009

Support (8)

  • I liked this article. It was colorful and contained a lot of information. --Clarky 10:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree. It's a very good article.--RexRacer -talk 15:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I like it. A nice historical look at the development and release of GS. At the time, of course, this was all new and novel, so there's a good reason to document it thoroughly. --((Marton imos)) 00:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Spr 4d 132.png Aura-Knight 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Its Totally Awesome.--David Aipom (Talk to me) 15:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I liked it, it showed what might've happened in GS and had a lot of informational pictures.--Hey1031 15:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Spr 4d 132.png to Martonimos. Alpha Totodile 23:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. It's a great article, and it shows in some light how the game was planned out to be. ~~Takoto - サソデイ 23:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Object (5)

  • Meh. Seems kind of empty and not detailed to me. Maybe a bit more organization of pics, and I might choose it. ht14 12:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--Mooites Talk to me, baby! 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean? Have you even visited it? This is the article talking about the beta, not a possible remake. --RexRacer -talk 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • It's detailed and informative, but personally, I think someone might have overdid the pictures. If you could clean it up a bit more, I'll agree. JirachiWishmaker0802 00:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • It doesn't seem to have enough substance to really merit being a featured article. It's pretty, but it doesn't reach any standards of greatness. -- evkl (need to talk?) 04:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Too flimsy a topic for an FA - not enough substance or attention-grabbing material within. NP Chilla 09:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

  • I tidied up the article, so it looks more readable. Tell me if you like it or if it looked better before. - Clarky13