Talk:Pokémon Crater/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
* I was a member, and, though there was a more recent logo, it was overall a good article--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c40a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
* I was a member, and, though there was a more recent logo, it was overall a good article--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c40a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


===Object (1)===
===Object (2)===
* I don't think this article should get featured... Even if we put aside the fact that it's about a fan-game with fan-Pokémon (and that's a really big ''if''), it's just not that good. Definitely not close to the articles we already have featured. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 12:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
* I don't think this article should get featured... Even if we put aside the fact that it's about a fan-game with fan-Pokémon (and that's a really big ''if''), it's just not that good. Definitely not close to the articles we already have featured. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 12:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
*It's a frickin' ''fan site.''  --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 21:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


===Other comments===
===Other comments===

Revision as of 21:18, 12 August 2008

Support (2)

  • It's a good article.--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 12:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I was a member, and, though there was a more recent logo, it was overall a good article--KukiTalk 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Object (2)

  • I don't think this article should get featured... Even if we put aside the fact that it's about a fan-game with fan-Pokémon (and that's a really big if), it's just not that good. Definitely not close to the articles we already have featured. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 12:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Other comments