Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokégear/Featured article candidate"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Support (6))
m (Support (7))
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==[[Pokégear]]==__NOTOC__
 
==[[Pokégear]]==__NOTOC__
===Support (6)===
+
===Support (7)===
 
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
 
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
 
*I Think This Should Be A Featured Article. [[User:Brennan1357|Brennan1357]] 7:38, 12 September 2010 (EST)
 
*I Think This Should Be A Featured Article. [[User:Brennan1357|Brennan1357]] 7:38, 12 September 2010 (EST)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*I think that it should be a featured article. The work put in is superb. Great job. I approve it.--[[User:Pokemon26|Pokemon26]] 18:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 
*I think that it should be a featured article. The work put in is superb. Great job. I approve it.--[[User:Pokemon26|Pokemon26]] 18:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  +
*I guess it should be. But it still needs work in anime section.--[[User:Ash's Infernape|<span style="color:gold">Ash's</span>]] [[User_talk:Ash's Infernape|<span style="color:silver">Infernape</span>]] 22:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
  +
**If that's the case, then it shouldn't be an FA. An FA displays something that is a model for other articles to strive for. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#003366"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#527935"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 23:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
   
 
===Object (6)===
 
===Object (6)===
Line 19: Line 21:
   
 
===Other comments===
 
===Other comments===
  +
Is this over yet? A month passed 8 days ago. [[User:Turtwig A|<font color="#CD7F32">Turtwig's</font>]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|<font color="#FF7F00">A-B-Cs</font>]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|<font color="#green">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|<font color="#yellow">contribs</font>]]) 11:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:06, 30 September 2010

Pokégear

Support (7)

  • I Think This Should Be A Featured Article. Brennan1357 7:38, 12 September 2010 (EST)
  • This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. Alex726 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. Gengarzilla 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. Pokemaster97 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -Tyler53841 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think that it should be a featured article. The work put in is superb. Great job. I approve it.--Pokemon26 18:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • I guess it should be. But it still needs work in anime section.--Ash's Infernape 22:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
    • If that's the case, then it shouldn't be an FA. An FA displays something that is a model for other articles to strive for. ht14 23:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Object (6)

  • The anime section is too list like for my liking. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. PhantomJunkie 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too many lists (which make the article seem longer than it really is), short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --Maxim 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too list-y and incomplete. CuboneKing 03:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the anime section needs help, and there's no manga information at all. Needs a bit of work still. --ZestyCactus 03:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Like the above, and also, the tables are too wordy... we have the articles for those broadcasts too. ht14 04:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Other comments

Is this over yet? A month passed 8 days ago. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 11:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)