Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokégear/Featured article candidate"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Object (3): OBJECTION!)
(Object (4))
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*Too many lists (which make the article seem longer than it really is), short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*Too many lists (which make the article seem longer than it really is), short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*Too list-y and incomplete. [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 03:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 
*Too list-y and incomplete. [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 03:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  +
*Yeah, the anime section needs help, and there's no manga information at all. Needs a bit of work still. --[[User:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#006400">'''Zesty'''</span>]][[User talk:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#3CB371">'''Cactus'''</span>]] 03:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
   
 
===Other comments===
 
===Other comments===

Revision as of 03:13, 1 September 2010

Pokégear

Support (4)

  • This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. Alex726 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. Gengarzilla 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. Pokemaster97 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -Tyler53841 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Object (4)

  • The anime section is too list like for my liking. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. PhantomJunkie 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too many lists (which make the article seem longer than it really is), short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --Maxim 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too list-y and incomplete. CuboneKing 03:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the anime section needs help, and there's no manga information at all. Needs a bit of work still. --ZestyCactus 03:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Other comments