Talk:Pokégear/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Object (3)) |
Tyler53841 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Pokégear]]==__NOTOC__ | ==[[Pokégear]]==__NOTOC__ | ||
===Support ( | ===Support (4)=== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
*This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. [[User:Alex726|Alex726]] 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | *This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. [[User:Alex726|Alex726]] 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. [[User:Gengarzilla|Gengarzilla]] 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | *Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. [[User:Gengarzilla|Gengarzilla]] 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | *I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
===Object (3)=== | ===Object (3)=== | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 29 August 2010
Pokégear
Support (4)
- This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. Alex726 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. Gengarzilla 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. Pokemaster97 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -Tyler53841 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Object (3)
- The anime section is too list like for my liking. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. Phantom♫Junkie 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Too many lists (which make the article seem longer than it really is), short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --Maxim 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
