Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokégear/Featured article candidate"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Object (0))
(Object (1))
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
 
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
 
*The anime section is too list like for my liking. [[User:Turtwig A|<font color="#CD7F32">Turtwig's</font>]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|<font color="#FF7F00">A-B-Cs</font>]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|<font color="#green">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|<font color="#yellow">contribs</font>]]) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*The anime section is too list like for my liking. [[User:Turtwig A|<font color="#CD7F32">Turtwig's</font>]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|<font color="#FF7F00">A-B-Cs</font>]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|<font color="#green">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|<font color="#yellow">contribs</font>]]) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  +
**I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. [[User:Phantomjunkie|<span style="color:red">Phantom</span>]]♫[[User talk:Phantomjunkie|<span style="color:black">Junkie</span>]] 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  +
 
===Other comments===
 
===Other comments===

Revision as of 16:27, 29 August 2010

Pokégear

Support (2)

  • This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. Alex726 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. Gengarzilla 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Object (1)

  • The anime section is too list like for my liking. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
    • I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. PhantomJunkie 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Other comments