Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(→Support (2): supp) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]==__NOTOC__ | ==[[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]==__NOTOC__ | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (3)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
*This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | *This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ::Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#C11B17">でんのう</font>]] <font color="#347C2C">☢</font> [[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#151B8D">'''Z'''えんし</font>]] 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | * Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#C11B17">でんのう</font>]] <font color="#347C2C">☢</font> [[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#151B8D">'''Z'''えんし</font>]] 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
*This ''is'' my first time voting, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Object (1)==== | ====Object (1)==== | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 9 October 2010
Pikachu (Pokémon)
Support (3)
- This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--Alex726contributions 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe Bulbasaur? 梅子❀✿ 02:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--Alex726contributions 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--でんのう ☢ Zえんし 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is my first time voting, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Object (1)
- The trivia section is way too disorganized. It's Turtwig A! My talk or wiki edits 02:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
