Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Object (1): Please remember to update the count along with your vote.)
Line 1: Line 1:
==[[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]==__NOTOC__
==[[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]==__NOTOC__
====Support (4)====
====Support (5)====
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
*This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Line 8: Line 8:
*This ''is'' my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*This ''is'' my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great triva and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


====Object (2)====
====Object (2)====

Revision as of 18:48, 10 October 2010

Pikachu (Pokémon)

Support (5)

  • This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--Alex726contributions 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Maybe Bulbasaur? 梅子 02:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--Alex726contributions 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--でんのう Zえんし 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • This is my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) Ataro 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great triva and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. Pokemaster97 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Object (2)

Other comments