Talk:PK24: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Nintendo Mad (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
As a follow-up, if we assume it is Cilan's Crustle, can't we assume the Piplup is Dawn's and the Bulbasaur is Ash's????[[User:Eeveewithwings123|Eeveewithwings123]] ([[User talk:Eeveewithwings123|talk]]) 17:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC) | As a follow-up, if we assume it is Cilan's Crustle, can't we assume the Piplup is Dawn's and the Bulbasaur is Ash's????[[User:Eeveewithwings123|Eeveewithwings123]] ([[User talk:Eeveewithwings123|talk]]) 17:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:After just watching it online, the way that Oshawott argued with Piplup does suggest that it's Dawn's Piplup. --[[User:Nintendo Mad|Nintendo Mad]] ([[User talk:Nintendo Mad|talk]]) 12:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:49, 22 February 2013
Airing
"It aired alongside M15."
Accourding to M15 the US version of the 15th Pkmn film was released. Was this Pikachu short released/shown too? If not, "In Japan it aired alongside M15." should be a proper phrasing as in that case the film did not air alongside M15 in the US (even though nobody might care about inferior US releases anyway).
Btw, if it wasn't shown: Are there any plans for a US homevideo release of the 15th film with this pikachu short or something? -Bernd (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Crustle
How do we know that that was Cilan's Crustle and not just any Crustle. There were a lot of other wild pokemon in this, after all. Morgil27 (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
As a follow-up, if we assume it is Cilan's Crustle, can't we assume the Piplup is Dawn's and the Bulbasaur is Ash's????Eeveewithwings123 (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- After just watching it online, the way that Oshawott argued with Piplup does suggest that it's Dawn's Piplup. --Nintendo Mad (talk) 12:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
