Talk:Korrina's Lucario

Page merge

Shouldn't we merge this page with a similar one since they are the same page but have a different set of useful information? PattyMan 03:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes. --Pokemaster97 00:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Mainspace

This is a given isn't it? Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 16:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I'd say it's good to go. Korrina's Lucario has been important enough (and will be even more important, with the Gym Battle coming up). ☼ BlazingFist ☼ 17:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Separate move templates?

Is it really necessary to have two separate move templates for Lucario and Mega Lucario. Unlike other form changes, Mega Evolutions don't have exclusive moves and don't learn/lose any upon transforming. Having two tables for what could contain the same information seems pointless. Watchermark (talk) 15:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree. Anyone else? --Rikeo (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree, it's rather redundant. --Pokemaster97 00:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

If the second (or first) move template is gone, what do we do about the images? I agree about the seperate move templates being redundant by the way. PattyMan 01:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Can't we just use a more complex switch? --Abcboy (talk) 03:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Or couldn't we just put the pictures among the others, and get it to say 'Using (x) as Mega Lucario'. Watchermark (talk) 10:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Well someone immediately undid my edit right after I merged them with the reason, "Bad idea, considering Mega and regular one have shown different array of moves and on the moves pages, Megas are treated as different forms." How are megas different from the regulars? They've always been the same. --Rikeo (talk) 11:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

And WHEN have Megas ever shown a different array of moves? There is absolutely no reason for this thinking. Watchermark (talk) 15:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)