Talk:Ilex Forest shrine/Featured article candidate

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Ilex Forest shrine

Support (9)

  • A few weeks ago this was a featured stub. Now I think it could be a featured article. It's well written, has all relevant information in all canons, and is just good. It really is. --electAbuzzzz 16:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I also support the promotion of this article. It has sections for the three main media (games, anime, manga), with all the events in these canons highly detailed. I have no hesitation in voting for this article (and indeed had considered nominating it myself. Damn your mindreading skills, Buzzy!) —darklordtrom 23:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
    • The above comment makes me pissed; find the reason why. MaverickNate 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Did it appear in the TCG, Nate? If it didn't, we don't need a section. —darklordtrom 23:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
        • That's not what I am pretend mad about. =P "the three main media (games, anime, manga)"...Now that's why I'm being fake upset. MaverickNate 23:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I would love to see one of the Featured Stubs make it as a featured article. We have improved this article a whole lot, and we should show it off. MaverickNate 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • This definitely is very good. Amazingly thorough and clear, it's made an amazing improvement in the past weeks.--RexRacer 23:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh... this is another one of mine. Agree, with all the above comments.--Clarky13 23:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • This page is just plain amazing. This page has CuboneKing's Support!! (*cough* That's a big deal) --CUBONE PWNS (Planet CuboneBone Club) THE VERY BEST PAGE! 01:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I can't believe how much this article has improved. It is a symbol of Bulbapeida's power. I so think it should be an FA.alec9 * - * 04:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
  • This article is so informative I can't believe it used to be a featured stub Turtwig A Contributions 18:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
  • This seems just fantastic to me. Not flashy, but exceptionally thorough. A real example of what we're looking to do with all our articles. -- evkl (need to talk?) 15:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Object (0)

Other comments