Talk:Charizard (Base Set 4)/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Aura-Knight (talk | contribs) m (→Support (1)) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
* It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | * It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
* I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:39, 16 September 2008
Support (1)
- Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. TTEchidna 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. Aura-Knight 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Oppose (1)
It's an good acticle but it's far below FA quality. MathijsP 06:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Other comments
- It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--Wowy 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
