Talk:After You (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Sumwun|Sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | [[User:Sumwun|Sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:"Not affected by Protect" means that the move is not blocked by Protect. Of course, this is because After You is a non-damaging move. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 02:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | :"Not affected by Protect" means that the move is not blocked by Protect. Of course, this is because After You is a non-damaging move. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 02:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
== "Go Ahead" is neither more accurate nor more natural as a translation, so why is it necessary? == | |||
@Force Fire: Re [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=After_You_%28move%29&type=revision&diff=2579637&oldid=2579635 this]. What is the point of giving a less accurate translation when the official English name is both accurate and natural? [[User:Satorukun0530|Satorukun0530]] ([[User talk:Satorukun0530|talk]]) 09:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:55, 9 January 2017
does after you fail on allys? Pokemoninfo 22:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- No, using After You on allies is the entire point of the move. Blazios 22:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
It says that the move is unaffected by Protect...
If Protect has priority, doesn't it mean that a user of Protect always goes first, and then After You fails on it? Where it says "Affected by Protect: no" shouldn't it say yes? Sumwun (talk) 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- "Not affected by Protect" means that the move is not blocked by Protect. Of course, this is because After You is a non-damaging move. --Abcboy (talk) 02:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
"Go Ahead" is neither more accurate nor more natural as a translation, so why is it necessary?
@Force Fire: Re this. What is the point of giving a less accurate translation when the official English name is both accurate and natural? Satorukun0530 (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
