Talk:Aaron's Beautifly
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
cmon, really?? do we really need this?? -- MAGNEDETH 01:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Lucian has Bronzong whose page is about the same length. Don't you want to give Aaron something as well? tc26 01:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- maybe well just have to get rid of Lucian's Bronzong as well. -- MAGNEDETH 01:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- If that's the case, they'd already have deleted it months ago...but they didn't. tc26 02:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- true. but im still not so sure about all these pages. -- MAGNEDETH 02:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- In my opinion, if all the Pokémon cards can have their own pages than whats the big deal about some anime characters having pages for one of their Pokémon? --ケンジのガール 02:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, your card equivalent is each and every CoD, which I don't aren't all notable. Think of a different example, cause cards don't work. MaverickNate 02:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- With anime, we do have some restrictions on what we can make such as pages on a Pokémon of the day. With cards there are no restrictions which I don't find fair. And personally, I don't feel all cards are notable. That's what Pokébeach is for. Why can't a deck share one page or two? Letting one Pokémon that belongs to someone of importance have its own page isn't that big of a deal when compared to how many pages we have on Pokémon cards. Too much of Bulbapedia is dedicated to cards. Every time I click the Random page button, one out of five times it's a card. --ケンジのガール 02:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- There would be no way to decide which card is notable over another. What would we do, get rid of an entire set because "There are just too many"? Deciding which cards would be notable would be one of the least fair things that we could do. And we do have certain restrictions. To name one, we don't make seperate pages for reprints. Plus, saying that PokéBeach could replace us for cards is such an insult. They rarely deal with anything but english cards; we have so much more information than them and saying that PokéBeach could replace us just shows how biased we can be. But, I don't think fighting about which is better: TCG or anime will get us anywhere. I think this article should stay. MaverickNate 03:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- With anime, we do have some restrictions on what we can make such as pages on a Pokémon of the day. With cards there are no restrictions which I don't find fair. And personally, I don't feel all cards are notable. That's what Pokébeach is for. Why can't a deck share one page or two? Letting one Pokémon that belongs to someone of importance have its own page isn't that big of a deal when compared to how many pages we have on Pokémon cards. Too much of Bulbapedia is dedicated to cards. Every time I click the Random page button, one out of five times it's a card. --ケンジのガール 02:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, your card equivalent is each and every CoD, which I don't aren't all notable. Think of a different example, cause cards don't work. MaverickNate 02:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- In my opinion, if all the Pokémon cards can have their own pages than whats the big deal about some anime characters having pages for one of their Pokémon? --ケンジのガール 02:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- true. but im still not so sure about all these pages. -- MAGNEDETH 02:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- If that's the case, they'd already have deleted it months ago...but they didn't. tc26 02:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- maybe well just have to get rid of Lucian's Bronzong as well. -- MAGNEDETH 01:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Game
Should its DP counterpart be mentioned? YinYang 23:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
