Bulbapedia talk:Blocking policy: Difference between revisions
('t) |
(→You know...: reply) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Bulbapedia is read by many young people, so we can't swear. --[[User:Pikagold|Pikagold]] 17:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | Bulbapedia is read by many young people, so we can't swear. --[[User:Pikagold|Pikagold]] 17:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:While a one-off won't subject you to a block (although this does depend on the administrator's discretion) it should earn you a lovely little warning. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 20:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:08, 3 August 2009
Blocking administrators should be required to have registered e-mail addresses
I think that any administrator who blocks a user, for any reason, should have his/her e-mail address on the Bulbapedia system, to allow the blocked user to e-mail the administrator and ask for more details for the reason of the blocking. User142 | Talk 05:24, 12 January 2006 (CST)
The block log is visible to all, and I think a blocked user will see the reason they are blocked when they try to edit pages. In any case, as per current policy, appeals go to the Editor-in-Chief. - 振霖T 02:54, 13 January 2006 (CST)
It should be fairly easy to appeal the ban on BMGf as well anyway, especially with that allowing for posting by unregged users, unlike 'pedia. --Archaic 06:14, 13 January 2006 (CST)
You should be able to edit your tpage anyway, even if blocked.--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, but some people get banned because of their talk page. The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room... 17:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- How's that?--Tmwps 06:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Inappropriate comments, such as swearing and etc. --Clarky13 06:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- What's wrong with swearing? Wikipedia isn't censored, so why should we be?--Tmwps 06:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Inappropriate comments, such as swearing and etc. --Clarky13 06:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- How's that?--Tmwps 06:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the point on uncivil behavior
Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Considering the language is abusive.... no. — THE TROM — 07:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
You know...
Bulbapedia is read by many young people, so we can't swear. --Pikagold 17:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- While a one-off won't subject you to a block (although this does depend on the administrator's discretion) it should earn you a lovely little warning. —darklordtrom 20:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
