Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/PsychicRider

Support (2)

• Agree. A good, contributing user. Good edits, approachable, good guy. Seems like a good candidate to me. --electAbuzzzz 17:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
• +Support. It's basically been all him and me doing the user space edit warnings. His help hasn't gone unnoticed/unnappreciated in my eyes. Porygon-Z 18:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (1)

• Vehemently Disagree. Sure, let's nominate the entire community... --Maxim 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Care to explain? --electAbuzzzz 17:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
    • I don't see him as admin. Simply. It's just a pointless nomination. Not everyone can become an admin. If he can, why can't I? --Maxim 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
      • So that's what this is about... How about because he's approachable and reasonable and nice and you're... not? A good admin needs more than just contributing a lot. It's a requirement, not the only requirement. --electAbuzzzz 17:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
        • Sigh. Can we please not argue about this? While I agree that nominating everyone is a really really bad idea, voting against someone just because you didn't get voted for isn't a good reason to. TTEchidna 18:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
          • Oh, who cares. An admin is not a person who smiles to everyone. A good admin is a good admin. I disagree with this nomination and it's my thing. I have my reasons. There are thousands of better candidates for an admin. --Maxim 18:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Other comments