Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/PsychicRider: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Ooops again! DD:) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Agree'''. I think he's a great pick. [[User:Gligar|<font color="green">'''Gli'''</font>]][[User talk:Gligar|<font color="blue">'''gar'''</font>]] 10:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | *'''Agree'''. I think he's a great pick. [[User:Gligar|<font color="green">'''Gli'''</font>]][[User talk:Gligar|<font color="blue">'''gar'''</font>]] 10:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Agree''' PsychicRider works FAST and PRODUCTIVELY. He contributes GREATLY to what is needed to be finished.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small>☆</small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 05:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | *'''Agree''' PsychicRider works FAST and PRODUCTIVELY. He contributes GREATLY to what is needed to be finished.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small>☆</small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 05:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Agree''' because he works hard to make BP better. [[User:MathijsP|MathijsP]] 07:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
====Oppose (4)==== | ====Oppose (4)==== | ||
*'''Vehemently Disagree.''' Sure, let's nominate the entire community... --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | *'''Vehemently Disagree.''' Sure, let's nominate the entire community... --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 1 November 2008
Support (7)
- Agree. A good, contributing user. Good edits, approachable, good guy. Seems like a good candidate to me. --electAbuzzzz 17:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- +Support. It's basically been all him and me doing the user space edit warnings. His help hasn't gone unnoticed/unnappreciated in my eyes. Porygon-Z 18:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Agree. This guy once covered three moves for my relinking project that I had been putting for months, all in one day. Dedicated and helpful. --((Marton imos)) 18:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support. One of the best editors I've ever seen. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 20:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Agree. Lots and lots of edits. He knows Pokémon--RexRacer -talk 20:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Agree. I think he's a great pick. Gligar 10:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Agree PsychicRider works FAST and PRODUCTIVELY. He contributes GREATLY to what is needed to be finished.--☆Tavisource 05:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Agree because he works hard to make BP better. MathijsP 07:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose (4)
- Vehemently Disagree. Sure, let's nominate the entire community... --Maxim 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Care to explain? --electAbuzzzz 17:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see him as admin. Simply. It's just a pointless nomination. Not everyone can become an admin. If he can, why can't I? --Maxim 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- So that's what this is about... How about because he's approachable and reasonable and nice and you're... not? A good admin needs more than just contributing a lot. It's a requirement, not the only requirement. --electAbuzzzz 17:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sigh. Can we please not argue about this? While I agree that nominating everyone is a really really bad idea, voting against someone just because you didn't get voted for isn't a good reason to. TTEchidna 18:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, who cares. An admin is not a person who smiles to everyone. A good admin is a good admin. I disagree with this nomination and it's my thing. I have my reasons. There are thousands of better candidates for an admin. --Maxim 18:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC).
- Sigh. Can we please not argue about this? While I agree that nominating everyone is a really really bad idea, voting against someone just because you didn't get voted for isn't a good reason to. TTEchidna 18:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- So that's what this is about... How about because he's approachable and reasonable and nice and you're... not? A good admin needs more than just contributing a lot. It's a requirement, not the only requirement. --electAbuzzzz 17:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see him as admin. Simply. It's just a pointless nomination. Not everyone can become an admin. If he can, why can't I? --Maxim 17:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Care to explain? --electAbuzzzz 17:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm with Maxim here. Psychic Rider is a good user, but he just barely meets the edit criteria and has no contributions to the Template namespace. None. This means that he has basically made about 517 constructive edits here. I had to make well over 2000 mainspace contribs (I actually think it was over 3000, but I'm not positive) before I was granted administratorship. Niceness doesn't cut it. I'm starting to lose my patience with this nominating system. --ニョロトノ666 20:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but Disagree A good user, but not experienced enough--DCM((TalkContributions))
- Disagree, as much as i dislike him, Maxim makes a good point. I don't think PhychicRider would make it as an admin. No offence. ~~Takoto タコト| サソデイ = 愛 13:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
