Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/Pachirisulover12

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Support (7)

  • I 100% agree and I could'nt think of a better person to become admin (:--Davidaipom 20:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • PL12 is a great helper too...she devotes 100% of her efforts here when needed. Wynaut?--Tavisource 20:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • As David Tavismax said--KukiTalk 20:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • I haven't seen much of her, but she sounds like a good user to me, so I support. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 20:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Im quite new to Bulbapedia, so I dont know if my vote will count, however, Ive looked at her many edits, and Ive had a chance to talk to her on another site, from what I can tell she is exactly the type of person I would want to be an admin. - unsigned comment from Rachey (talkcontribs)
  • She's young, but, she's a hell of an editor. She's nice, edits like a beast, and all that good stuff. Porygon-Z 01:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  • I think yes. Lord of Origami 12:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support, because I think she would be an good admin. MathijsP 07:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (8)

  • Oppose - Pachi is really nice and all, but, I just don't think shes quite ready for Admin. -- MAGNEDETH 23:59, 28 September 2008
  • Oppose. Really. This kind of pisses me off, because I see the only people supporting here are the little group of "friends" who want administratorship for everybody who's "nice." I really want the people who care about the stuff that really matters to step up here and vote against this. PL12 was a huge userspace abuser before the ban, with missions and such, hasn't made enough constructive main/template/BP space contributions, went on a months-long hiatus (and when she got back, she made exactly 11 mainspace contribs compared to a vast number of Talk Page contribs). Honestly, she just isn't ready for adminship. Really not ready. --ニョロトノ666 01:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Who the hell is this? I've never seen her/him edit before :\ And seeing what Poli said about the userspace/talkpage thing...Yeah, i don't think whoever this is would make a good admin. ~~Takoto タコト| サソデイ = 愛 08:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose. What? what exactly has she done? --Mooites Talk to me, baby! 18:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Everything nice, such as helping others with various things.--Tavisource 18:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
I mean stuff like contributing? being nice isnt why people are admins!--Mooites Talk to me, baby! 18:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes. She's a very nice person. She helps other users with "various things." Again, let me stress that she is a "very nice person." Which has absolutely no bearing on whether or not she'd be a good administrator. --ニョロトノ666 18:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Politoed the reason you dont support anyone is cause you want to be the only admin and dont want competition. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 18:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
What competition? And even so, there's still several other admins. --PsychicRider 18:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
And Guardian, the reason you support freaking everybody is because you don't like the users like me and 'pikablu who focus more on helping the pedia than being "kind and friendly!" --ニョロトノ666 18:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Poli is a little extreme, but I have to agree with him on this one specifically. This is classic "friends voting". I see no reason for this to happen. --electAbuzzzz 18:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

ElectAbuzzzz is right. I'm getting off on a little bit of a rant here, and I need to slow down. I apologize for losing my temper. I guess I just need to have more faith in TTE's ability to determine good choices for admins. After all, if he feels someone isn't able to handle administrative powers, he doesn't have to grant them, regardless of popular vote. --ニョロトノ666 18:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

  • whoops, turns out I was only checking mainspace contribs. Now having seen all of them, my vote is changed to oppose. Plus, I hate anyone who has a PearlShipping reference on their userpage--Kkllnn blastoise 00:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
That is not a good reason.--Tavisource 00:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Note how I CROSSED OUT THE PEARLSHIPPING THING!!!!!! god. My real reason would not be crossed out.--Kkllnn blastoise00:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC
  • Oppose she says (behind my back) that she finds me obsessive and annoying, well she never said anything like that to me, and yes I thought we were friends, now you just stabbed me in the back, is that really something we want in an admin someone who pretends to be your friend and then just talks bad about you the moment your gone. Now I hope you lose. How could you Pachi, how could you? --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 08:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
That's not a good enough reason to vote against her. But I guess, since this Nomination was originally about, "Oh, let's vote for her because she's nice," I guess it's okay.--Blazevoir!! 11:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Who says its not a good enough reason? It wasnt originally about that, it was because I genuinely thought she would make a great admin and then she went and said stuff about me behind my back which isnt the behaviour of an admin, wouldnt you agree?--Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 13:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
You're just saying that to get back at her. Just because some one talks about you behind your back, it doesn't mean they aren't Admin material.--Blazevoir!! 13:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Same

Other comments

She hasn't really contributed a lot in the last few months. I won't vote against her, though, because she has an excuse.--Blazevoir!! 20:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

She was on holiday. Apart from that shes frequently on, and frequently doing good work. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 20:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I just want to say that I was gone for a while, and I've been learning the new ups and downs of this place. I really don't know if I'm ready for administratorship.... PL12 20:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Pachi, its great that your humble but you dont need to be in this. I know and all of your supporters know that youd be a great admin. Ive seen you as an admin on IPGL, and you are excellent admin material, combine that with your knowledge of Pokemon and good contributions to BP, theres no reason you shouldnt be an admin. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 20:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Where did PL12 go? I guess she couldn't wait for me to return...--Tavisource 20:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
She even says she isn't ready. That's what I don't like about this "Democracy". You can nominate people who aren't sure they even want to be an Admin.--Blazevoir!! 20:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

TFYA (That's Thank Goodness for your absence), cuz u would've been rejected in May or earlier--KukiTalk 20:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

She was just being humble, no one is gonna be "yes i deserve it" cos that is the fastest way to lose it. She deserves to be an admin, look at her contributions and her friendliness to all users. She cant come on here and say "vote for me" cos then no one would, you gotta show humility (is that the right word?)--Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 20:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Blazevoir, you should vote for her. I know you weren't here as long, but she'd been very helpful in the past...and she did welcome you, right? (I know that has nothing to do with being admin, but I just find that a bit trivial.)--Tavisource 20:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, this is true Democracy. Me being told who to vote for.--Blazevoir!! 20:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I just said that you should...not that you need to.--Tavisource 20:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Blazevoir dont vote agianst her just because you dont like me, this isnt about me, this is about Pachirisulover12 who is clearly a great user and great admin material. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 20:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I do agree that if she doesn't feel like she's ready for it, she can go the DCM way and deny it for a later time. --PsychicRider 20:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

But she is ready and Im sure in her mind she knows she is, but how do you say "I am ready to be an admin" without sounding like a complete dick. She didnt say "no, im not ready" she took the humble approach and said she didnt know. People dont always say exactly what they mean. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 20:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm not voting for or against her. That's that. I'm staying away from this page.--Blazevoir!! 20:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
How rude.--Tavisource 20:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
And what if she is meaning what she said. --PsychicRider 20:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
She would have said "no im not ready" instead of "i dont know if im ready" That was just to not sound arrogant. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 20:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I won't support or oppose but PL12 was a userspace abuser before the ban and has made under 1,000 mainspace edits and is not ready. So if she improves within the next 1-6 months I'll reconcider and people stop chooseing your pals choose someone good who meets all the standards and not barely and that I leanred in my 9-10 months here.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 02:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not on one side or the other. On one hand, she has made a great amount of big and small edits to the mainspace, most of them WikiGnome edits. But on the other hand, recently I've seen quite a bit of user/user talk namespace edits, but I'll have to look into it. Gligar 02:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Takoto, just to clarify, PL12 is a girl. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 20:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

BTW, everybody, "Wynaut?" (why not?) is not a good reason to vote for someone as an admin candidate. --ニョロトノ666 01:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

This is not a section of 'Other comments'. It is a discussion of how 'nice' this person is. And, trust me, being 'nice' is only one of the many qualities of an admin. It is important, yes, but then again, so is leadership and...some other stuff that I haven't figured out yet. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links