Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/Kogoro: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Just a warning....)
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
*'''Support'''. When you check the Recent Changes, I almost always see her name. '''[[User:Optimatum|<span class="explain" title="Optimus35"><sc>Θρtιmαtum♏</sc></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Optimatum|Talk]]|[[User:Optimatum/sig/Pikachu|Links]]</sub> 08:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. When you check the Recent Changes, I almost always see her name. '''[[User:Optimatum|<span class="explain" title="Optimus35"><sc>Θρtιmαtum♏</sc></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Optimatum|Talk]]|[[User:Optimatum/sig/Pikachu|Links]]</sub> 08:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Agree''' changed my mind--[[User:DCM|<font color="#FF1111">DCM</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:DCM|((<font color="#DAA520">Shut the **** up</font>]]</sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/DCM|<font color="#C0C0C0">Spy on My Edits</font>))]]</sub>
*'''Agree''' changed my mind--[[User:DCM|<font color="#FF1111">DCM</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:DCM|((<font color="#DAA520">Shut the **** up</font>]]</sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/DCM|<font color="#C0C0C0">Spy on My Edits</font>))]]</sub>
====Oppose (2)====
====Oppose (3)====
*'''Disagree'''. Just because I hate nominations and I prefered the older original way of having to work to greatness.<span style="font-family:Calibri">~[[User:Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#AAAAFF;">Ποκε</span><span style="color:#FFAAAA;">μανιακ</span><span style="color:#999999;">α0β</span>]]</span> 23:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Disagree'''. Just because I hate nominations and I prefered the older original way of having to work to greatness.<span style="font-family:Calibri">~[[User:Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#AAAAFF;">Ποκε</span><span style="color:#FFAAAA;">μανιακ</span><span style="color:#999999;">α0β</span>]]</span> 23:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


*'''Disagree'''.  I second that.  However, my other reasons are that she only has barely over the minimum edit requirement and has only been ''actively'' contributing since October.  So, for now, I say no.  I think she may make a very good admin at some point in the future.  --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 02:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Disagree'''.  I second that.  However, my other reasons are that she only has barely over the minimum edit requirement and has only been ''actively'' contributing since October.  So, for now, I say no.  I think she may make a very good admin at some point in the future.  --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 02:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


*'''Disagree''' Politoed makes a good point there, if Kogoro has only been contributing since October, I don't think there's quite enough experience. Yeah, quality over quantity, but still. [[User:The Dark Fiddler|The Dark Fiddler]] - [[User talk:The Dark Fiddler|Smarter than the average bear!]] 16:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


====Other comments====
====Other comments====

Revision as of 16:44, 11 November 2008

Support (6)

  • Support. She has a lot of awesome contributions. Chocolate 21:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. To be honest, I think she would make a perfect admin. ~~Takoto - サソデイ 23:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. A very kind, understanding user. She also knows what she is doing in any situation. Knowing how to take a good scan is a major plus. Very devoted, based on how she has cards from Base Set to Stormfront. A very good user who I think would be a very great help if she had special admin powers. MaverickNate 02:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support...ooo...nice...me liek this person to be admin...very helpful, good edits...and not to mention, very observant and smart in wiki code...yes, I would know. Hey, I already did not mention the fact that she is very friendly...okay?--Tavisource 08:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. When you check the Recent Changes, I almost always see her name. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links 08:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Agree changed my mind--DCM((Shut the **** upSpy on My Edits))

Oppose (3)

  • Disagree. Just because I hate nominations and I prefered the older original way of having to work to greatness.~Ποκεμανιακα0β 23:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. I second that. However, my other reasons are that she only has barely over the minimum edit requirement and has only been actively contributing since October. So, for now, I say no. I think she may make a very good admin at some point in the future. --ニョロトノ666 02:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree Politoed makes a good point there, if Kogoro has only been contributing since October, I don't think there's quite enough experience. Yeah, quality over quantity, but still. The Dark Fiddler - Smarter than the average bear! 16:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

I think people are missing the point with the whole adminship thing. You nominate a user purely if a situation comes up where it is neccesary to have one, NOT to nominate all the decent users in case something comes up, as that is overkill. Only nominate as it is needed. [/my2cents]Glinn Mgraw 09:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Chocolate clearly stated on Kogoro's talk page that he was just looking for someone to nominate, which definitely isn't how you do it. I'm not going to support or oppose this, and here's why: Kogoro, in terms of card scans, has been an absolutely amazing contributor, and I'm very pleased to see her level of dedication here. However, she's not been here long. So, I won't support or oppose this time, but if a time comes that someone nominates her because they believe she is ready to be an administrator, I will pledge my full support. Cipher (Talk) 10:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually I, believe nominations should no longer take place and the BulbaBoard decides instead.~Ποκεμανιακα0β 02:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Über seconded. --ニョロトノ666 03:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree, however, there may be some users that have had their hopes up to become admins for a long time, and seeing as they were elected puts even more excitement for some. ht14 16:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)