Difference between revisions of "User talk:Redstar"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(PokeGods)
(PokeGods)
Line 129: Line 129:
 
:I was into the fandom at the time, and I can tell you that neither Ampharos nor Bellossom were rumored as PokéGods. Not only that, but you remove the additions I made of other PokeGods. What's the point of having a list if you don't list the most popular ones? The page already lists several minor ones, so I just added several of the more popular ones. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 17:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:I was into the fandom at the time, and I can tell you that neither Ampharos nor Bellossom were rumored as PokéGods. Not only that, but you remove the additions I made of other PokeGods. What's the point of having a list if you don't list the most popular ones? The page already lists several minor ones, so I just added several of the more popular ones. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 17:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::the ones you listed ive never heard of. the ones Umeko listed i have. ill discuss the ones you added with some other people, but do NOT remove Amph or Bell. also, i left a message here, dont go to my page to respond. its very annoying to spread a conversation over two pages. -- '''[[User:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">MAG</span>]][[User:MAGNEDETH#Interesting Stuff|<span style="color:#696969;">NE</span>]][[User talk:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">DETH</span>]]''' 17:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::the ones you listed ive never heard of. the ones Umeko listed i have. ill discuss the ones you added with some other people, but do NOT remove Amph or Bell. also, i left a message here, dont go to my page to respond. its very annoying to spread a conversation over two pages. -- '''[[User:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">MAG</span>]][[User:MAGNEDETH#Interesting Stuff|<span style="color:#696969;">NE</span>]][[User talk:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">DETH</span>]]''' 17:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
  +
:::Everyone responds on each other's page in that means. You should just get over it.
  +
  +
:::Neither Ampharos nor Bellossom were every rumored. Neither received methods for obtaining them in Red, Blue, or Yellow. They are not PokéGods. If you can find evidence to the contrary, provide a source. All you have to do is type into Google "Ampharos pokegod" or "Bellossom pokegod". We are here to provide facts, not unsourced faulty memory. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 17:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:21, 19 January 2010

Welcome

Bulbapedia logo.png
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Redstar!

As a new user, you may wish to learn a few things that will be useful in your editing:
Getting started
Policies and guidelines
Other helpful links
Miscellaneous
  • A list of administrators that you can contact in case of a problem can be found here.
  • On talk pages, please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), or by using the "Your signature with a timestamp" (button_sig.png) button at the top of the edit window.
  • To upload images, please use the Bulbagarden Archives. To activate your account at the Archives, please login there using the same username and password you use here on Bulbapedia. This may also be used to activate an account at Bulbanews.
  • If you wish to make a page for a character you made up, please do so at User:Redstar/Name.
 Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  — THE TROM — 01:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)  
 

Feebas and Magikarp

Replied on my talk page; any further discussion will be posted there. If you choose to post more there, I assume you will check it for my response and will not issue further notification. Thanks. — THE TROM — 02:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm still getting used to signing and other necessities to Wiki contribution, so I apologize if I don't always remember/know things.

Secondly, I'll have to keep that in mind for future reference, as far as Pokemon-to-Pokemon comparisons. I did feel it needed to be brought up because there is not a single reference to its similarities to Magikarp in the entire article, save they have the same species type and level-up moves. Redstar 02:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk Page Comments

Please don't erase talk page comments for no reason. Trust me, you do NOT want to end up like Big Johnno, who got into an edit war with a sysop over comments the former had erased and was trying to keep erased. That user ended up blocked and subsequently had every erased comment restored. --☆Coolピカチュウ! 03:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Well it's my talk page, and there wasn't even a discussion taking place. It didn't seem like a big deal to delete something that had no purpose, since it was basically a private message stating to look somewhere else. Redstar 03:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Unrelated. You leave it there no matter what. Unless it is spam, and that isn't. ht14 03:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Well I'm just going to say that that's bullshit. Redstar 03:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Site's rules. >_>--☆Coolピカチュウ! 03:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Show me that particular rule that dictates private talk pages. Redstar 03:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

This'll do for now. Dispute resolution. Also, talk to admins if you disagree. ht14 04:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
It's here.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 04:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Good catch. Mine didn't make sense, but it was close...somewhat... ht14 04:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Clearly I can use those rules to my benefit, since I view your comments as an attack on me. I have no idea why either of you are watching my personal talk page out of the thousands of contributors and articles on this site, nor do I feel these comments constitute as "the article itself", IE: my talk page. No, they are about the "subject of the article", IE: the comments posted on my talk page.

Because of your help in notifying me of the rules that show why I'm free to clean my talk page of this unnecessary clutter I'll be sure to delete them in due time, without further complaints. Redstar 04:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

At least use the colons (:)... ht14 04:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok, you can archive it. Then, just link to it...don't know if it'll help. Just click move. Move to an archive. Done, the new talk page only links to archive. ht14 04:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean by "use colons", though I'm sure I'll figure it out.
On a side note, I believe I'll leave my Talk page as is, since this was really quite fun and I wouldn't mind other people seeing me act like a douchebag. Thanks for playing it cool, both of you. :D Redstar 04:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Parsers...

It's not size...use px for the images. Otherwise, it will be too large. ht14 04:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Redstar 04:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
You wrote size=130. Probably not you though. Never mind. ht14 04:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
No, I didn't write anything... You're probably referring to my changes on either the Lugia or Ho-Oh pages, in which case I only reverted. Redstar 04:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
That's why I said never mind... ht14 04:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, and I just clarified that. :P Redstar 04:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Don't resign over the unsigned message. You'll put the wrong time in there. Just leave it be; forgetting is no major deal unless you do it every time. — THE TROM — 05:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Dude. Mind your own business. One little profile on one giant Wiki out of hundreds of equally large Wikis is no concern of yours, thanks. Redstar 08:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
TROM is an admin, as am I, so it actually is his concern. Now, he's telling you this because you're not supposed to replace {{unsigned}} with your signature, and it would be best if you listen to his message instead of blowing it off. The time-stamp is important, so just don't replace it with your signature if you had forgotten to sign when you made the comment. - Kogoro | Talk to me - 09:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not ignorant. I know perfectly well that TROM is an admin, and I'm choosing to disregard him. Being an administrator is no excuse to micromanage. Redstar 09:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Disregarding warnings from an administrator is a great way to earn yourself blocks. I would suggest you reconsider your choice. - Kogoro | Talk to me - 09:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not disregarding warnings from an admin, I'm threatening to disregard warnings from an admin in the future. Feel free to block me in case I do so, but for now a threat is just words. Get over it. Redstar 09:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry, I'm over it. See you in a day. Take this time to have a chill pill, come back and be a constructive part of the community. — THE TROM — 09:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

The Humans article

If you want to make it, go for it--even if it starts as a stub, people will add to it. And it'll be good! And interesting. -- evkl (need to talk?) 01:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Since you asked

I like to answer. The amount of "On the forums" people keep saying is getting really annoying to me. I think that Mewtwo rumor was just a rumor, and was later proven false. However, if I'm wrong, we will know soon enough when the games come out. MaverickNate 01:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Uhhh, sorry, wrong person. Forget this ever happened. =p MaverickNate 01:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring

Never, ever, ever, revert a revert. That's edit-warring. Even if you're right. The appropriate thing to do is turn to an admin for a ruling. --electAbuzzzz 14:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

So, being an admin, what's your ruling? There are fansprites of the Nido's (at the least) here, here and here, so there are fakes. --Oz (The Wizard at Work!) 14:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm in Oz's favor on this one. Other than Pikablu, they're all fake Pokémon. And both of you can consider this "strike one" on the subject of edit-warring. --electAbuzzzz 14:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I'm willing to live with that strike. This site's bigger than me, of course. :) Also, that's two thus far, Redstar(hey, that rhymes! Maybe I should be a poet.). --Oz (The Wizard at Work!) 14:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

redirecting

Unless the article is to be deleted, you don't need to relink these articles. It's okay to have redirects, as there is nothing wrong with them. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 21:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

PokeGods

dont touch the page any more. if you do, i will count it as edit warring, and you will be blocked. im tired of you removing this stuff simply saying "they didnt exist" because, duh, they didnt! thats what the article is about! but, Bellossom and Ampharos were originally considered PokeGods. i cant take you back to 1997/8, but if you were into the fandom at the time, you would know. -- MAGNEDETH 17:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I was into the fandom at the time, and I can tell you that neither Ampharos nor Bellossom were rumored as PokéGods. Not only that, but you remove the additions I made of other PokeGods. What's the point of having a list if you don't list the most popular ones? The page already lists several minor ones, so I just added several of the more popular ones. Redstar 17:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
the ones you listed ive never heard of. the ones Umeko listed i have. ill discuss the ones you added with some other people, but do NOT remove Amph or Bell. also, i left a message here, dont go to my page to respond. its very annoying to spread a conversation over two pages. -- MAGNEDETH 17:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Everyone responds on each other's page in that means. You should just get over it.
Neither Ampharos nor Bellossom were every rumored. Neither received methods for obtaining them in Red, Blue, or Yellow. They are not PokéGods. If you can find evidence to the contrary, provide a source. All you have to do is type into Google "Ampharos pokegod" or "Bellossom pokegod". We are here to provide facts, not unsourced faulty memory. Redstar 17:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)