<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=VMan+2002</id>
	<title>Bulbapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=VMan+2002"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/VMan_2002"/>
	<updated>2026-06-25T22:15:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reflect_Type_(move)&amp;diff=2646731</id>
		<title>Talk:Reflect Type (move)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reflect_Type_(move)&amp;diff=2646731"/>
		<updated>2017-05-30T02:45:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VMan 2002: /* RKS System */ fixed spelling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==RKS System==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says the move fails when the opponent has the ability {{a|Multitype}}.Does the move fail when the opponent has {{a|RKS System}}?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:VMan 2002|VMan 2002]] ([[User talk:VMan 2002|talk]]) 02:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Changing Into The Opponents Type==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this include dual typed pokemon?[[User:Vuvuzela2010|Vuvuzela2010]] 13:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So let me get this straight... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This move changes the user&#039;s type or types to match the foe&#039;s type or types.  In other words, it functions exactly as {{m|Conversion}} did in Generation I.  If this is right, shouldn&#039;t it be noted somewhere on the article?  &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- &#039;&#039;unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mew? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is Mew listed as learning the move by leveling if  the level is unknown/doesn&#039;t exist? Also, it seems like until a level is put there, a note of why the level is &amp;quot;--&amp;quot; should be made. [[User:DwarfWoot|DwarfWoot]] 16:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Because Mew learns the move at level 1.  It&#039;s like that for all Pokemon that learn a move at level 1.  &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- &#039;&#039;unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 02:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Burn Up interaction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/pokemon-sun-moon-battle-mechanics-research.3586701/page-59#post-7157225 This] indicates that using Reflect Type on a Burned Up pure Fire type affected by Forest&#039;s Curse will have the user become Normal/Grass. If someone&#039;s faster than me, can they double check it? By extension, has someone already verified that using it on a Fire/&amp;lt;something&amp;gt; type that has used Burn Up, it will become &amp;lt;something&amp;gt;-type (and not Normal/&amp;lt;something&amp;gt;)? [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hello. I had already confirmed that using it on Fire/something just becomes a something type not normal/something. I&#039;ve also just confirmed what smogon found, it becomes Normal/Grass in this situation. ETA: The grass typing on the reflected type pokemon is listed as a forest curse info box in the battle summary. [[User:Jmvb|JMVB - literally it doesn&amp;amp;#39;t stand for anything]] ([[User talk:Jmvb|talk]]) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks. I didn&#039;t know you had also used Reflect Type on those as well. So I guess there&#039;s evidence that Burned Up Fire types technically/internally become Normal-type, then. Again, thanks for all your tests! (And I hope you don&#039;t mind if I try to reword things a little in order to account for all your findings.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My guess is that Normal is just the fallback default type, which gets used because Reflect Type didn&#039;t fail, but Forest&#039;s Curse doesn&#039;t count towards its main types. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#A70000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Snorlax&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#0000A7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Monster&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 17:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::While I certainly don&#039;t think so, I would be trying to avoid any assumption&amp;amp;mdash;incl. &amp;quot;Burned Up pure Fire types become Normal (..)&amp;quot;&amp;amp;mdash;on mainspace pages anyway. I think we can do without. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{indent}}I have nothing with Burn Up so I can&#039;t test this until Saturday when Cyndaquil becomes available via Island Scan, so I&#039;m suggesting it here in case someone wants to do it first. Since it&#039;s apparently been confirmed that pure Fire-types become typeless with Burn Up, I think it&#039;s worth testing the effectiveness of Fighting-type and Ghost-type moves on a Pokemon that has used Burn Up and is affected by Forest&#039;s Curse, to see whether the displayed &amp;quot;Normal/Grass&amp;quot; is &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; Normal/Grass or if the game is using the Normal type graphic as a placeholder for (no type)/Grass. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My understanding is that it is actually &amp;lt;blank&amp;gt;+&amp;quot;Grass added&amp;quot; message by Reflect Type&#039;s target, but Normal+&amp;quot;Grass added&amp;quot; by its user afterwards (and that the target will be hit by Ghost-type attacks, while the user will be unaffected, so that the display is &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; either way). [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Snatch ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just tested using {{m|Snatch}} against {{m|Reflect Type}} in Sun and Moon, both from an ally in doubles as well as from an opponent, and it didn&#039;t work. Could it be done in earlier generations? Is there maybe a bug in Sun and Moon? --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] ([[User talk:GuyPerfect|talk]]) 20:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I did some testing with White + Black 2 and X + Alpha Sapphire using Snatch with {{m|Camouflage}}, {{m|Conversion}}, {{m|Conversion 2}} and Reflect Type. I found that only two of the four moves were captured by it: Camouflage and Conversion. Conversion 2 and Reflect Type are not Snatchable in any generation. I&#039;ve accordingly updated Reflect Type&#039;s infobox to reflect that (no pun intended). --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] ([[User talk:GuyPerfect|talk]]) 00:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VMan 2002</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reflect_Type_(move)&amp;diff=2646730</id>
		<title>Talk:Reflect Type (move)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reflect_Type_(move)&amp;diff=2646730"/>
		<updated>2017-05-30T02:45:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VMan 2002: RKS System&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==RKS System==&lt;br /&gt;
The article says the move fails when the opponent has the ability {{a|Mutlitype}}.Does the move fail when the opponent has {{a|RKS System}}?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:VMan 2002|VMan 2002]] ([[User talk:VMan 2002|talk]]) 02:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Changing Into The Opponents Type==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this include dual typed pokemon?[[User:Vuvuzela2010|Vuvuzela2010]] 13:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So let me get this straight... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This move changes the user&#039;s type or types to match the foe&#039;s type or types.  In other words, it functions exactly as {{m|Conversion}} did in Generation I.  If this is right, shouldn&#039;t it be noted somewhere on the article?  &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- &#039;&#039;unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mew? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is Mew listed as learning the move by leveling if  the level is unknown/doesn&#039;t exist? Also, it seems like until a level is put there, a note of why the level is &amp;quot;--&amp;quot; should be made. [[User:DwarfWoot|DwarfWoot]] 16:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Because Mew learns the move at level 1.  It&#039;s like that for all Pokemon that learn a move at level 1.  &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- &#039;&#039;unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 02:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Burn Up interaction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/pokemon-sun-moon-battle-mechanics-research.3586701/page-59#post-7157225 This] indicates that using Reflect Type on a Burned Up pure Fire type affected by Forest&#039;s Curse will have the user become Normal/Grass. If someone&#039;s faster than me, can they double check it? By extension, has someone already verified that using it on a Fire/&amp;lt;something&amp;gt; type that has used Burn Up, it will become &amp;lt;something&amp;gt;-type (and not Normal/&amp;lt;something&amp;gt;)? [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hello. I had already confirmed that using it on Fire/something just becomes a something type not normal/something. I&#039;ve also just confirmed what smogon found, it becomes Normal/Grass in this situation. ETA: The grass typing on the reflected type pokemon is listed as a forest curse info box in the battle summary. [[User:Jmvb|JMVB - literally it doesn&amp;amp;#39;t stand for anything]] ([[User talk:Jmvb|talk]]) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks. I didn&#039;t know you had also used Reflect Type on those as well. So I guess there&#039;s evidence that Burned Up Fire types technically/internally become Normal-type, then. Again, thanks for all your tests! (And I hope you don&#039;t mind if I try to reword things a little in order to account for all your findings.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My guess is that Normal is just the fallback default type, which gets used because Reflect Type didn&#039;t fail, but Forest&#039;s Curse doesn&#039;t count towards its main types. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#A70000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Snorlax&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#0000A7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Monster&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 17:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::While I certainly don&#039;t think so, I would be trying to avoid any assumption&amp;amp;mdash;incl. &amp;quot;Burned Up pure Fire types become Normal (..)&amp;quot;&amp;amp;mdash;on mainspace pages anyway. I think we can do without. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{indent}}I have nothing with Burn Up so I can&#039;t test this until Saturday when Cyndaquil becomes available via Island Scan, so I&#039;m suggesting it here in case someone wants to do it first. Since it&#039;s apparently been confirmed that pure Fire-types become typeless with Burn Up, I think it&#039;s worth testing the effectiveness of Fighting-type and Ghost-type moves on a Pokemon that has used Burn Up and is affected by Forest&#039;s Curse, to see whether the displayed &amp;quot;Normal/Grass&amp;quot; is &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; Normal/Grass or if the game is using the Normal type graphic as a placeholder for (no type)/Grass. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My understanding is that it is actually &amp;lt;blank&amp;gt;+&amp;quot;Grass added&amp;quot; message by Reflect Type&#039;s target, but Normal+&amp;quot;Grass added&amp;quot; by its user afterwards (and that the target will be hit by Ghost-type attacks, while the user will be unaffected, so that the display is &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; either way). [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Snatch ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just tested using {{m|Snatch}} against {{m|Reflect Type}} in Sun and Moon, both from an ally in doubles as well as from an opponent, and it didn&#039;t work. Could it be done in earlier generations? Is there maybe a bug in Sun and Moon? --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] ([[User talk:GuyPerfect|talk]]) 20:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I did some testing with White + Black 2 and X + Alpha Sapphire using Snatch with {{m|Camouflage}}, {{m|Conversion}}, {{m|Conversion 2}} and Reflect Type. I found that only two of the four moves were captured by it: Camouflage and Conversion. Conversion 2 and Reflect Type are not Snatchable in any generation. I&#039;ve accordingly updated Reflect Type&#039;s infobox to reflect that (no pun intended). --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] ([[User talk:GuyPerfect|talk]]) 00:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VMan 2002</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>