Template talk:Redirect

Thanks Martinomos. This just needs a function where you can have multiple (like Ash). ht14 22:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

We have to create a new one for that. Changing this one screws up countless pages. ^Moldy_Orange 22:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, no we don't, only two pages use this one to begin with. ^Moldy_Orange 22:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

It's only being used on one or two right now, Moldy.

I like the way Electabuzzzz handled Ash. We could set up the template to do it, but it would involve switches and all sorts of crap I don't feel like dealing with.

Also, I guess I shouldn't have bolded that, huh? --((Marton imos)) 22:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh...well, we have other articles that say something like: This article is about *. For the ___, see ___. Do you understand? ht14 22:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I think this template is supposed to be subst-ed, and the text is supposed to be on the page, NOT in a template. That could be why only two pages used it. ^Moldy_Orange 23:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Would this work though? This article is about {{{1}}}. For {{{2}}}, see [[{{{3}}}]]. ht14 23:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Isn't that what it is now?

It was just created a few minutes ago. That's why only two (three now) pages use it. --((Marton imos)) 23:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Not true. Now others like Paul and Southern Island can use it. ht14 23:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I'm convinced, carry on. ^Moldy_Orange 23:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

We should create one for the "If you were looking for the...". There are a few of those. ^Moldy_Orange 23:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

But let's wait on that one for when TTE comes back, that one seems a bit more confusing to do. ^Moldy_Orange 23:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)