| This page is a candidate for deletion because Unneeded.
Someone has decided that this article should not be included as part of Bulbapedia. If you agree with this decision, state your reasoning on
When a consensus has been reached, this notice can be removed by an administrator.
This page was last edited on March 23, 2013 at 9:21 AM.
The problem with the new wording is that we can't always distinctively define conservative, especially in terms of Pokémon. --Argy 20:11, 18 December 2005 (CST)
Do you think this template diserves a makeover like the others? Here's my idea:
|This article contains information which may conflict with conservative views.|
What about this version?
Should we redesign the template to look like this?:
YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS CHIMCHARRING AROUND WITH THIS.
- I believe the template is fine as it is. Trainer-c 08:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- No. Ignoring the style, the article may not be offensive; it may only be seen as offensive by some users. Note that this is not used in any mainspace article and shouldn't be in a mainspace article. It is used primarily for shipping, particularly homosexual ones. Race, as the hiddencomment in the picture suggests, has nothing to do with it. Template stays. — THE TROM — 08:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Is this template needed?
It seems this template is mainly used on shipping pages that don't seem to be set apart from other ships for any particular reason, but also on Pokémon controversy and Pokémorphs. I don't think the contents of "Pokémon controversy" is actually controversial—it merely describes controversy. Pokémorphs arn't really a controversial topic either. --SnorlaxMonster 09:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)