Talk:Tucker's Swampert

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

this page isn't necessary to keep. i figure other anime characters have Pokémon have descriptions, so I've decided to make them for
The Frontier Brains.

See, this kind of falls into a gray area. One one hand, we do have pages for Erika's Gloom and Lt. Surge's Raichu, but only because those were slightly more important Pokémon.
By the way, if the page isn't necessary, then why did you create it? --PAK Man Talk 19:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

1)im bored. 2)Frontier Brains are my favorite =)
but, like I said, it doesn't matter if it's deleted, I did this for fun...it took like 3 seconds...with minor difficulties -__- →User:Thomas1652

Personally, I think the Frontier Brains should have pages for their Pokémon, I mean, they're about as important as the Gym Leaders, since they're ingame characters. --Ricco 12:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, they can have pages. But only the most important of them can have an article for itself. We can't have pages for everyone. Jmath 17:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
The question is, which of Tucker's Pokemon is more notable- Arcanine or Swampert? Both of them were portrayed equally in battle, as I recall. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talkcontribs) 19:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
If you have a decision, then this'll apply for Tate/Liza's Pokémon as well... ht14 19:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
I honestly hope we don't have an article about Tate and Liza's Pokémon. They did nothing other than battle. How does that make either one of them notable? --PAK Man Talk 19:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
They're notable for the same reason as Lt. Surge's Raichu, Erika's Gloom, Falkner's Pidgeot, and Roxanne's Nosepass- they belong to gym leaders, and are their main Pokemon. Now, back on the subject of Tucker. Personally, I think we should keep both. Tucker didn't seem to favor one over the other at all. And seeing as they were both used simultaneously in a double battle, and seemed to display equal strength, more or less.... It really comes out to a tie, I think. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talkcontribs) 19:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Same discussion was held on Tucker's Arcanine page. I still say, since they're double-battle partners, they should share their page. It would apply for Lunatone and Solrock as well, plus save space, instead of repeating info over twice. ArcToraphim 20:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Pokémon that were only used in battles may not be worth having articles on. Just because we have those four now doesn't mean we can't delete them if we ever get a more solid notability policy. --FabuVinny |Talk Page| 20:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I like that idea. We need a lot of those...let's see...Pop-Pop and Nanny...Roman and Kylie... ht14 20:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools