Do you ever browse Bulbapedia via a mobile device? Would you like to help us out? Check out this month's improvement drive, Mobile March!
Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on irc.systemnet.info.

Talk:Tackle (move)

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Just a note for the EP001 issue: The announcer does speak but only says "it's on the attack". That said, the move is probably Tackle anyway. --FabuVinny T-C-S 18:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Is the screenshot from POKéMON ShinyGold? Because that'd be mixing cannon with fandom, I guess.- unsigned comment from Goukazaru (talkcontribs)

So? It's still a picture of the move Tackle. Tina δ 16:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
By a Pokémon that can legally learn it, too. TTEchidnaFire echyGSDS! 04:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Too much info!

Is it really necessary to list every single Pokémon that uses tackle in the anime? There's so many! [[Derian]] 18:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Move Screenshot

Can I use this gif? -lgdlgd

For what? --PhantomJunkie 03:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Sadly, no. That gif is horrible quality, we prefer .png or animated .pngs for move screenshots. Jellotalk 03:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Why Twice?

Is there any spicific reason Skiploom and Jumpluff are constantly listed twice on this page?--EpicShadow 17:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

They learn it twice. Bluesun 17:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Information on power

The infobox on the right only has information on Generation V+ data, but never mentions this anywhere, which had me pretty confused about my results of comparing Quick Attack to Tackle in Generation IV. I have seen changes in values like this explained in other infoboxes on the bulbapedia. Would it be alright to add [Generation V+] next to the "Power: 50"-value", or at least to explain somewhere in the box that the given values refer to Generation VI? - unsigned comment from Laetitian (talkcontribs)